 Recommend this site to a friend |
 deutsch |
Letter to the IMF relation to the
no-value-ECM - 05/12/16
Letter to the CDU Youth Union - 14/11/16
Letter to the IDW regardingthe EFSF’s FinancialStatements – 19/10/16+ Correspondence IDW -> MFD 15/11/16and MFD -> IDW 16/11/16
Letter to the european FinancialSupervision relation to theno-value-ECM - 03/10/16
14th Letter to the Parliament for JudicialReview of the Free-TradeAgreements - 27/05/2016
Application to the ConstitutionalCourt for Judicial Review of theFree-Trade Agreements - 27/05/2016
BILD - Pillory of Shame - 21/12/15
Criminal charge of making a falseallegation against netzpolitik.org - 17/09/2015+ response of Public Prosecutor inBerlin - 20/05/2016
Letter to the Ifo President - 05/11/14
Complaint to the GermanPress Council - 21/11/13
Letter to the IMF - 17/10/13+ Supplementary letter 22/11/13
Letter to the EU Commission - 17/10/13
Letter to the Presidium of the ECB - 17/10/13
Against the dismissal ofFederal President Wulff - 13/06/13+ Response from the HannoverPublic Prosecutor's Office 25/07/13+ Opinion of the Alliance forDemocracy 21/08/13+ Letter to Celle General State Prosecutor’sOffice 10/10/13
Petition for the independence of theJudiciary and State Prosecutor - 06/05/13+ response by the Petitions Committee ofthe German Bundestag - 08/06/16
Petition for the introduction of genuine, directdemocracy - 25/04/13+ reply of the Bundestag - 14/11/16
Petition against corruption - 25/03/2013
Criminal complaint re. Target 2 10/11/2012
1st Constitutional Complaint - against theFederal Government - 21/03/12
2nd Constitutional Complaint - ESM incl.supplement - 12/06/12
3rd Constitutional Complaint - ESM incl.supplement - 18/09/12
4th Constitutional Complaint - FederalGouvernment against the ECB (by CJEU) 27/09/12+ response of FederalConstitutional Court - 06/06/16
Press reports 27/6/12 + 24/10/12
Springer complaint 28/09/11
Delayed insolvency
Petition to the German Parliament 31/05/11
Petition to the European Parliament 21/06/11
1st Letter to Members of Parliament 23/06/11
2nd Letter to Members of Parliament26/09/11
3rd Letter to Members of Parliament 19/05/12
4th Letter to Members of Parliament 23/05/12
5th Letter to Members of Parliament 20/06/12
6th Letter to Members of Parliament 27/06/12
7th Letter to the Parliament 27/9/12
8th Letter to the Parliament 15/10/12 - against Corruption 15/10/12 in addition toPetition 25/03/13
9th Letter to the Parliament 24/10/12
10th Letter to the Parliament 05/12/12
11th Letter to the Parliament - 20/05/13
12th Letter to the Parliament - 16/10/13
13th Letter to the Parliament - 10/12/15
Questions to the Bundestag 27/28/06/12
To the members of the Bundesrat 14/06/12
To the minister of finance 12/06/12
Second Letter to the FinanceMinister - 27/02/15
Objection to Hartz IV - Judicial ReviewComplaint BVerfG
1st Lawsuit against Federal government21/03/11
2nd Lawsuit against Federal government05/10/11
Open letter 16/18/02/11
|
Former Constitutional Judge Sceptical
Hans-Joachim Jentsch, a German Constitutional Court judge from 1996 to 2005, reacted demurely to the announcement from the left and the Greens that they intend to seek enforcement of the subpoena of former NSA employee Edward Snowden to appear before the Bundestag’s NSA Investigation Committee under a case filed in Karlsruhe. Quoted in the Frankfurter Rundschau (Saturday edition, 25/10/14), Jentsch said: “I am rather sceptical about this, as it depends strongly on weighing one right against another – i.e. the right of the (Bundestag) members to an explanation and the right and obligation of the Federal Government to prevent damage to the country in a way that does not harm the interests of associated states. And this obligation weighs relatively heavy.” Jentsch added: “Since this involves precedent, it is difficult to predict. But I think the chances of success are not very high for this case.” Constitutional Judge Ulrich Battis expressed a similar opinion to the newspaper: "The Government could guarantee Snowed safe conduct but that would be an affront to the United States. That's why I would rather expect the case to be dismissed." What is open to question here is whether the Federal Government appoints someone as a constitutional judge and perhaps then allows him to say what Angela Merkel cannot say as head of state – as in the case of Hans-Jürgen Papier, who is anti-grassroots, although his comments were on another issue. It cannot be that the guardians of the Constitution and senior judges, who represent the interests of the people, buckle before the self-proclaimed world police of the U.S.. This shows how much the government and the instruments of state power it controls, which are supposed to safeguard the people, the rule of law and democracy, can break down. Representation of the people is now the same as party dictatorship. This practice also attests to the Government's efforts to ennoble an unethically formed Constitution for an undemocratic system that completely alienates the people, is far removed from any sense of justice of the people, and instead of protecting the German people, protects another state power that controls the German people. This is obviously incomprehensible. |