ALLIANCE FO§ DEMOCRACY

Sensation! Court Condemns Politicians to Loss of Power!

Under “Interactive” you will find as the latest bombshell of the week a fictional ruling of the Supreme Criminal Court which – unlike our courts in the Federal Republic of Germany – is not presided over by judges who rule in favour of a particular party, in accordance with party quotas or party or government law. We have submitted a criminal case

The German People
versus
German Politicians,

i.e. against all members of the German Bundestag and the German Federal Government since the creation of the Federal Republic of Germany, who are accused of deception of the people. We have simulated a Supreme Criminal Court in order to set up a supervisory body for courts which are presided over by party-dependent judges who change justice into party political injustice. We have compiled three serious charges and announce the judgement of this court, which is completely independent of parties and politicians, as our bombshell of the week.

All court rulings are pronounced under the headline “In the Name of the People”. This is a meaningless formulation. The fictional court actually pronounces legal judgements in the name of the people. It only refers to three examples of cases of deception of the people. We ask that you read the judgement with legal objectivity, and the satirical passages with a sense of humour. The judgement is at the same time a plea for a revolution against the ruling politicians, who swear by God but deceive the people. They are to continue alone on their way with this God – but without the German people. The Party Chairman of the CSU, Horst Seehofer, has declared to the press that politicians must return from their dominant position to one of servitude. Furthermore, at a bock beer tapping ceremony in Munich at the Hofbräuhaus he called to those present “Where is the revolution then?” It will come – sooner or later!

Going once! Deception of the people – dictatorship under the cloak of democracy

The C parties advertise with Christianity and democracy. In fact, however, they are unchristian and dictatorial. The Basic Law was introduced in 1949 without the people over the people’s heads. It excludes the people from any direct involvement. The theoretical sovereign (the people) has been disempowered and its representative (parliament) has risen up to become the actual sovereign. The Basic Law was to be a temporary measure – until upon its reunification the German people gave themselves a new democratic constitution based on free self-determination. 24 years after reunification this promise has still not been fulfilled. Politicians continue to cling on tightly to their power – the C parties most of all. All tentative approaches towards a (partial) introduction of direct democracy (SPD, Greens, FDP – with the Left going furthest) have been - and are still being - blocked by the C parties.

The German Democratic Republic was a self-evident illegitimate state, while the Federal Republic of Germany today is also an illegitimate state, but only somewhat more subtle. It is an irony of history that the vicar who once led the campaign to uncover injustice in the German Democratic Republic is now the head of the large national state security system in the Federal Republic of Germany. Somewhat macabre, but true.

This should be enough of an explanation of the culpability of the C parties. All CDU chancellors have been dictatorial, even though - contrary to the better knowledge of the population – they have always proclaimed what great democrats they were.

Going twice! Deception of the people – the allocation process in the statutory social security system

In many respects, party politicians have been playing a casino game without parallel on behalf of the Federal Republic of Germany and in other nation states, and have recognised in the meantime that they have lost. In this context we also refer to our remarks on Facebook, namely our Facebook MfD page at www.menschenfuerdemo-kratie.de and our second Facebook page. There you will find corresponding detailed remarks which are unusually long for Facebook messages, but which we consider necessary in conjunction with the European elections. The parties have been – and are still – pursuing a policy of unaffordable gifts in order to cover up their own inferiority and inability and therefore attempt to appear attractive to the population of the country.

The enormous risks which have been entered into in the process cannot be financed. With proper financial planning this would have been evident from the beginning. These are sham political promises, air bubbles which can and had to burst. The losses have resulted in economic mismanagement which can no longer be rectified.

In order to cover up the real financial situation and dress up the state budget to appear to conform to the fiscal pact and debt brake, the state simply does not declare any of the debts in the budget – in particular, the so-called implicit debts hidden in the social security systems. The state does not allow these debts to apply to itself, but secretly transfers its position of loser to the citizens, against their will. Ultimately it is the citizen who is liable, who has to provide the guarantees. The citizens thereby become gamblers in the casino with their own money.

This deception of the people began with a first class coup, namely the conversion of the statutory social security systems (in particular pensions) to the so-called allocation process. In the allocation process, the working population finances the pensions of those who are now retired with their contributions; the future pension of the population that is now working then has to be paid for by the up-and-coming generation (the so-called generation contract). This system could not be financed from the very beginning. This is also apparent from the very beginning. The Money and Credit Department of the Federal Ministry of Economics confirmed this in writing with the signature of the then Federal Minister of Economic Miracles Prof. Dr. Ludwig Erhard. If the pension rights are not covered by sufficient levels of capital, the statutory social security system has to result in collectivist care at a low (social assistance) level. Nevertheless, Adenauer introduced the allocation process in order to pretend to the population that there was social security and in order to win the elections. Contrary to the statement of the well-known amateur carnival fan, who at the same time is a member of the CDU and former Federal Minister of Employment, Mr Blüm: “Your pension is safe!”, the population has received a raw deal. The result is that the people are adversely affected at the time of their life when they are most vulnerable - when due to their age they are no longer able to look after themselves.

The pension formula and Social Security Code suggest that the right to a pension is secure. This illusion has been supported by the Federal Constitutional Court by imputing the right of ownership to the statutory pension claims. In reality, however, this right of ownership has never been of any significant value and has been qualified in the meantime by the Federal Constitutional Court. Legally, all preparations have been made to reduce the pension claims of civil servants down to subsistence level – so no social security, as promised, but bitter poverty in old age.

Sold! Deception of the people - the euro

From the very beginning – i.e. during and before the introduction of the euro – it was clear that the euro cannot remain stable. Prof. Dr. Hankel was one of the early warning voices. But his voice was ignored in the same way as that of the former Minister for Economic Affairs Dr. Erhard upon the changeover of the social security system to the allocation process. The current euro crisis was not a surprise when it spread across Europe. No, it is systematic, it was foreseeable and foreseen – all reservations were swept aside by the historic fantasies of Helmut Kohl with respect to Europe.

Under the current circumstances, a united Europe can be nothing other than the merger of bankrupt states which were already long bankrupt before the introduction of the euro and which wanted to rescue themselves by means of a sham currency without any open currency reform or debt haircut. Now the “rescue” continues – debts are combated in a downward spiral with more and more new debts.

For example, the South European bankrupt states are being supported with more and more new credit guarantees / warranties. In order to ensure that it is even possible for this to work, the politicians have split up the debts: into debts which are duly reported in the state budget, and credit guarantees to bankrupt countries which are allowed not to appear in the state budget. This was carried out in a concerted manner in “backroom deals” of the leading personalities such as presidents and chancellors.

As this situation involves insolvent bankrupt countries which are only artificially rendered creditworthy on the basis of the credit guarantees, these credit guarantees must by their very nature result in debts. The state does not allow these debts to apply to itself, but secretly transfers its position of loser to the citizens, against their will. Ultimately it is the citizen who is liable, who has to provide the guarantees. The citizens thereby become gamblers in the casino with their own money.

The upshot of this is that the five states that call themselves supporters are just as bankrupt as the supported states. Support is only possible because the supposedly supporting states are themselves supported by their citizens. All of this is simply the delayed filing of insolvency. The costs for their own delay in filing for insolvency are passed on to the citizens. In addition, the citizens also have to bear the costs of the - prohibited - collusion to delay filing for insolvency, i.e. the so-called support for other bankrupt countries. The German citizen is therefore placed in a position to help finance Hartz IV benefits for the population of other countries instead of being able him/herself to take advantage of urgently required benefit increases.

The public is not informed of any of this. On the contrary: they are told that the next budget will be balanced without any new borrowing. This is a grotesque way of misleading the population – this is deception of the people.

For Italy, ECB President Draghi wanted some time ago to take over more than €200 billion in trade payables of the Italian government, i.e. the Italian state, and finance them through the ECB at the expense of the other EMU member states, who have to share the debts on a pro rata basis. This did not happen, so that support is now being provided by the purchase of ailing government bonds by the ECB.

Spain has twice received tranches to finance its ailing banks. Overall, the tranches provide support through the ECB, i.e. through the other EMU countries in accordance with the debt participation key totalling around €1 trillion.

Through its Prime Minister under President Hollande, France has recently declared that the euro has to be devalued, otherwise its current poor economic situation will result in unemployment and France no longer being competitive. It is too late for that – the devaluation (of the franc) should have occurred before the country joined the euro.

You, the readers, may draw your own conclusions. Everyone is bankrupt. In order to cover up the bankruptcy, or at least postpone it, the rescue activities are taking on greater and greater proportions.

A Federal President is driven from office because he resists the rescue of the euro by increasing levels of debt.
The debts are supposed to be communitarised in a European Banking Union.
The politicians of the EU are kept happy by means of “kickbacks” to the Commissioners. The number of Commissioners of the EU Commission should actually have been reduced on the basis of European treaties. But this is not happening because these are such nice lucrative positions for politicians, and the political classes - in particular smaller EU Member States - can be kept quiet and remain contented as a result. Officially the Commissioners receive emoluments, whereas in reality these are politically motivated kickbacks.
The control possibilities are being optimised by the introduction of BIC and IBAN in the SEPA process and through the international exchange of information at banks and summits. The abolition of cash will be a further step in this (control) direction. This is a further scam to unashamedly access the savings of all citizens.

The biggest criminals and Mafia members are to be found in the government capitals of the world. That says it all. The citizens are to pay for the gambling by the governments in the casinos, who have paid too much in order to be elected. And they have paid dearly - see our link: Negative financial assets per capita instead of large per capita assets (as for Springer). As a consequence, everyone is destined to become a loser with their share of third-party and implicit borrowing – at a level of debt of 160,000 to 180,000 per head. These are the debts which party politicians give to every newborn baby. How is that ever supposed to be paid?

In the future we will continue to comment in an appropriate manner on the crazy ideas associated with a new world order and how only this can be substantiated.