|
The highest German court -
A supporter of the Alliance for Democracy, on 18.09.2012,
submitted a constitutional complaint
with urgency as their own personal addendum to the constitutional complaint of the lawyers Jakob & Kollegen,
Heidelberg, against the ESM. The court only deigned to decide whether this was a case of urgency on 18.03.2014,
or in other words 1½ years later.
This decision is meaningless. The constitutional judges remain silent. Questions which seriously affect us all
remain unanswered: “The constitutional complaint is not accepted.” Every judge must substantiate his decision.
By this substantiation he seeks to obtain the understanding and acceptance of the parties to the process. Not
so the constitutional judges. They do not consider this necessary. They represent the highest court in the land.
They have the power.
To attack this power would be pointless! What does it interest the moon when a dog barks at it? Criticism fades
away unheard. Anyone who contests the structural prejudice of the Constitutional Court – the judges are chosen
by the world of politics, and are then supposed to pass judgement on politics! – is stamped as an inconvenient
complainer in a brief subsidiary clause. He should be happy that thanks to the grace of the high court, they have
even devoted a subsidiary clause to him.
The Alliance for Democracy would like to thank the Federal Constitutional Court sincerely for its indulgence.
|