 Recommend this site to a friend |
 deutsch |
Letter to the IMF relation to the
no-value-ECM - 05/12/16
Letter to the CDU Youth Union - 14/11/16
Letter to the IDW regardingthe EFSF’s FinancialStatements – 19/10/16+ Correspondence IDW -> MFD 15/11/16and MFD -> IDW 16/11/16
Letter to the european FinancialSupervision relation to theno-value-ECM - 03/10/16
14th Letter to the Parliament for JudicialReview of the Free-TradeAgreements - 27/05/2016
Application to the ConstitutionalCourt for Judicial Review of theFree-Trade Agreements - 27/05/2016
BILD - Pillory of Shame - 21/12/15
Criminal charge of making a falseallegation against netzpolitik.org - 17/09/2015+ response of Public Prosecutor inBerlin - 20/05/2016
Letter to the Ifo President - 05/11/14
Complaint to the GermanPress Council - 21/11/13
Letter to the IMF - 17/10/13+ Supplementary letter 22/11/13
Letter to the EU Commission - 17/10/13
Letter to the Presidium of the ECB - 17/10/13
Against the dismissal ofFederal President Wulff - 13/06/13+ Response from the HannoverPublic Prosecutor's Office 25/07/13+ Opinion of the Alliance forDemocracy 21/08/13+ Letter to Celle General State Prosecutor’sOffice 10/10/13
Petition for the independence of theJudiciary and State Prosecutor - 06/05/13+ response by the Petitions Committee ofthe German Bundestag - 08/06/16
Petition for the introduction of genuine, directdemocracy - 25/04/13+ reply of the Bundestag - 14/11/16
Petition against corruption - 25/03/2013
Criminal complaint re. Target 2 10/11/2012
1st Constitutional Complaint - against theFederal Government - 21/03/12
2nd Constitutional Complaint - ESM incl.supplement - 12/06/12
3rd Constitutional Complaint - ESM incl.supplement - 18/09/12
4th Constitutional Complaint - FederalGouvernment against the ECB (by CJEU) 27/09/12+ response of FederalConstitutional Court - 06/06/16
Press reports 27/6/12 + 24/10/12
Springer complaint 28/09/11
Delayed insolvency
Petition to the German Parliament 31/05/11
Petition to the European Parliament 21/06/11
1st Letter to Members of Parliament 23/06/11
2nd Letter to Members of Parliament26/09/11
3rd Letter to Members of Parliament 19/05/12
4th Letter to Members of Parliament 23/05/12
5th Letter to Members of Parliament 20/06/12
6th Letter to Members of Parliament 27/06/12
7th Letter to the Parliament 27/9/12
8th Letter to the Parliament 15/10/12 - against Corruption 15/10/12 in addition toPetition 25/03/13
9th Letter to the Parliament 24/10/12
10th Letter to the Parliament 05/12/12
11th Letter to the Parliament - 20/05/13
12th Letter to the Parliament - 16/10/13
13th Letter to the Parliament - 10/12/15
Questions to the Bundestag 27/28/06/12
To the members of the Bundesrat 14/06/12
To the minister of finance 12/06/12
Second Letter to the FinanceMinister - 27/02/15
Objection to Hartz IV - Judicial ReviewComplaint BVerfG
1st Lawsuit against Federal government21/03/11
2nd Lawsuit against Federal government05/10/11
Open letter 16/18/02/11
|
The highest German court -
A supporter of the Alliance for Democracy, on 18.09.2012, submitted a constitutional complaint with urgency as their own personal addendum to the constitutional complaint of the lawyers Jakob & Kollegen, Heidelberg, against the ESM. The court only deigned to decide whether this was a case of urgency on 18.03.2014, or in other words 1½ years later. This decision is meaningless. The constitutional judges remain silent. Questions which seriously affect us all remain unanswered: “The constitutional complaint is not accepted.” Every judge must substantiate his decision. By this substantiation he seeks to obtain the understanding and acceptance of the parties to the process. Not so the constitutional judges. They do not consider this necessary. They represent the highest court in the land. They have the power. To attack this power would be pointless! What does it interest the moon when a dog barks at it? Criticism fades away unheard. Anyone who contests the structural prejudice of the Constitutional Court – the judges are chosen by the world of politics, and are then supposed to pass judgement on politics! – is stamped as an inconvenient complainer in a brief subsidiary clause. He should be happy that thanks to the grace of the high court, they have even devoted a subsidiary clause to him. The Alliance for Democracy would like to thank the Federal Constitutional Court sincerely for its indulgence. |