share Recommend this site to a friend
deutsch deutsch
ALLIANCE FO§ DEMOCRACY
bombLetter to the IMF relation to the
Headbombno-value-ECM - 05/12/16
bombLetter to the CDU Youth Union - 14/11/16 bombLetter to the IDW regarding
Headbombthe EFSF’s Financial
HeadbombStatements – 19/10/16
Headbomb+ Correspondence IDW -> MFD 15/11/16
Headbomband MFD -> IDW 16/11/16
bombLetter to the european Financial
HeadbombSupervision relation to the
Headbombno-value-ECM - 03/10/16
bomb14th Letter to the Parliament for Judicial
HeadbombReview of the Free-Trade
HeadbombAgreements - 27/05/2016
bombApplication to the Constitutional
HeadbombCourt for Judicial Review of the
HeadbombFree-Trade Agreements - 27/05/2016
bombBILD - Pillory of Shame - 21/12/15 bombCriminal charge of making a false
Headbomballegation against netzpolitik.org - 17/09/2015
Headbomb+ response of Public Prosecutor in
HeadbombBerlin - 20/05/2016
bombLetter to the Ifo President - 05/11/14 bombComplaint to the German
HeadbombPress Council - 21/11/13
bombLetter to the IMF - 17/10/13
Headbomb+ Supplementary letter 22/11/13
bombLetter to the EU Commission - 17/10/13 bombLetter to the Presidium of the ECB - 17/10/13 bombAgainst the dismissal of
HeadbombFederal President Wulff - 13/06/13
Headbomb+ Response from the Hannover
HeadbombPublic Prosecutor's Office 25/07/13
Headbomb+ Opinion of the Alliance for
HeadbombDemocracy 21/08/13
Headbomb+ Letter to Celle General State Prosecutor’s
HeadbombOffice 10/10/13
bombPetition for the independence of the
HeadbombJudiciary and State Prosecutor - 06/05/13
Headbomb+ response by the Petitions Committee of
Headbombthe German Bundestag - 08/06/16
bombPetition for the introduction of genuine, direct
Headbombdemocracy - 25/04/13
Headbomb+ reply of the Bundestag - 14/11/16
bombPetition against corruption - 25/03/2013 bombCriminal complaint re. Target 2 10/11/2012 bomb1st Constitutional Complaint - against the
HeadbombFederal Government - 21/03/12
bomb2nd Constitutional Complaint - ESM incl.
Headbombsupplement - 12/06/12
bomb3rd Constitutional Complaint - ESM incl.
Headbombsupplement - 18/09/12
bomb4th Constitutional Complaint - Federal
HeadbombGouvernment against the ECB (by CJEU)
Headbomb27/09/12
Headbomb+ response of Federal
HeadbombConstitutional Court - 06/06/16
bombPress reports 27/6/12 + 24/10/12 bombSpringer complaint 28/09/11 bombDelayed insolvency bombPetition to the German Parliament 31/05/11 bombPetition to the European Parliament 21/06/11 bomb1st Letter to Members of Parliament 23/06/11 bomb2nd Letter to Members of Parliament
Headbomb26/09/11
bomb3rd Letter to Members of Parliament 19/05/12 bomb4th Letter to Members of Parliament 23/05/12 bomb5th Letter to Members of Parliament 20/06/12 bomb6th Letter to Members of Parliament 27/06/12 bomb7th Letter to the Parliament 27/9/12 bomb8th Letter to the Parliament 15/10/12 -
Headbombagainst Corruption 15/10/12 in addition to
HeadbombPetition 25/03/13
bomb9th Letter to the Parliament 24/10/12 bomb10th Letter to the Parliament 05/12/12 bomb11th Letter to the Parliament - 20/05/13 bomb12th Letter to the Parliament - 16/10/13 bomb13th Letter to the Parliament - 10/12/15 bombQuestions to the Bundestag 27/28/06/12 bombTo the members of the Bundesrat 14/06/12 bombTo the minister of finance 12/06/12 bombSecond Letter to the Finance
HeadbombMinister - 27/02/15
bombObjection to Hartz IV - Judicial Review
HeadbombComplaint BVerfG
bomb1st Lawsuit against Federal government
bomb21/03/11
bomb2nd Lawsuit against Federal government
bomb05/10/11
bombOpen letter 16/18/02/11





The resurrection of "doctor" Schavan – decline in values

We have already extensively reported twice on the case of the former education minister Annette Schavan (read also: "Mrs. Schavan, how more embarrassing will things become?" and "Schavan and zu Guttenberg") – on the one hand regarding the University of Düsseldorf and the stripping of the doctorate for the former education minister, combined on the other hand with the intention to accept a post as ambassador for the Vatican, after resigning as education minister. We also wrote about the situations of Schavan and Guttenberg – in both cases the doctoral theses were plagiarised – regarding their useful employment after this cheating scandal.

With regards to the leaders of the Federal Government, who should be setting an example, people's trust in the honesty of these leaders has been severely shaken.

When Joschka Fischer said that the EU had to learn that it was not only an economic community but also a community of values (in an article in the Süddeutsche Zeitung (SZ) from 29./30.03.2014 on page 2 under the heading "Europe, stay hard") it particularly related to the FRG nationally, even though Fischer’s comments were more supranational, i.e. Europe-wide and international. Within Germany, a decline in values can be noted, which has its origin in the networking of political lobbying according to the motto, "you scratch my back and I'll scratch yours". Because, for the always alleged but non existent democratic constitution, which can actually only be described as a sham democratic illegitimate state, this is very harmful to the normal citizens, as their interests are not protected, as sworn in official oath, and a promotion can occur but not for their benefit. It must be emphasised that the leaders in politics and sometimes also in the economy should present themselves as a value mirror for a nation, in which normal citizens can see themselves, and their own understanding of values can be oriented towards this, in order to be a role model. This is often no longer the case, particularly when the case of the resurrection of Doctor Schavan via the University of Lübeck shows that nothing adds up anymore in this country – the FRG – via such networking.

If one university in Düsseldorf – with supposedly the best attitude and integrity – after checking came to the conclusion that Ms Schavan's doctoral thesis plagiarised in 60 places, and another university in Lübeck came to the conclusion that they could still grant the doctoral certificate practically immediately after this withdrawal, and therefore the doctoral title, then something is not right within the university sector in the FRG if a university does not take into account the verdict of the expert committee of another university regarding the withdrawal of the title. And if – as it was depicted in the press by Springerverlag in BILD from 21.03.2014 on page 1, under the title "Schavan loses case on her doctoral title" – the Düsseldorf Administrative Court confirmed the withdrawal of Ms Schavan's doctoral title by the University of Düsseldorf with the reasoning that "the plaintiff cheated" and copied her doctoral thesis in 60 places and if the ex minister still refutes this accusation then this is an affront of an ex education minister to the expert committee, whose objectively verifiable decision surely cannot be completely disputed, even though there is a right of appeal against it.

If Ms Schavan said that she was not only secretly ashamed about the case of plagiarism of the ex minister for economic affairs Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg, then this in turn says something about the case of Ms Schavan.

If after the legally grounded withdrawal of the doctoral title, another university makes another decision against that of the university of Düsseldorf, who were the object of this administrative court procedure, and grants the doctoral title again, which Mrs Schavan had just lost, for the reason – and you can hardly believe it, if you have any decency and sense of values – that in her role as education minister and therefore as the agent of her friend Federal Chancellor Angela Merkel, she provided the University of Lübeck with €12 million in grants, that says it all. It no longer needs to be investigated which connections and motivations still play a role – whether church and political lobbying connections, whether just political preference by institutions, who receive grants from certain party political leaders – to make up for this mistake, which should now be balanced out on a whole other level using connections with the sham argument of honouring the €12 million in grants from Ms Schavan to this university – almost as a retrospective recognition. There are simply no words to express how such a contradictory decision could be made in a scientific university institution, and then with the emphasis on the material side of the benefits from the former education minister Ms Schavan before her resignation, i.e. almost honouring her friendly gesture to the university, of giving them grants from tax money. It is no longer comprehensible, that the level of a university can sink so low, especially in connection with the former education minister. As Germans we should be ashamed of how values are being trampled underfoot, by people in crucial roles. We see the death of the doctoral title and then the sudden immediate resurrection. This seems very Christian but is the exact opposite in fact. Questions relating to church and state arise here, which will have to be urgently dealt with in future, not only for us, but in other places. If Her Honour at the Administrative Court in Düsseldorf expressly points out that the verdict to strip Ms Schavan of her doctoral title due to plagiarism was "lawfully justifiable", then it shows a lack of instinct by the person responsible at the University of Lübeck to make the decision to give back the doctoral title immediately proclaiming the opposite to the university responsible for the doctorate in this case as pretended documentation of everything that was legally determined, even though it is not preferential for the party and does not relate to federal prosecutors bound by directives and to the home offices of the regional and federal government but rather a lower court ruling. How can it be that a university thwarts the known procedure of another university, and at the same time does not await jurisdiction on this, e.g. also the possible implementation of the normal channels, to carry out such legal acts. This also leads us to conclude a lack of integrity, and lack of values, in the exact place where they should primarily be present, namely in educational establishments. The whole thing only seems to be based on non impartial nepotism and friendly corruption. Seriously, we can no longer weigh up such behaviour in the sense of awareness of values, decency and moral. The opposite is true. And this affects all players in the network who allow such results and enforce their influence, simply because they are responsible for distributing the taxes of normal citizens, due to their position. The whole thing should be described as blatant abuse, whether universitarily regarding the University of Lübeck, or by way of networking, relating to the people affected at the university. The whole thing seen from the point of view of valuation means:
The €12 million grants are now used as justification by the University. The doctoral title from the University of Lübeck, which they awarded Mrs Schavan for this gesture, of granting funds to the university as a representative of the people of the nation regarding rights and obligations, is seen economically by everyone in the FRG as a thank you. This means that anyone, regardless of academic of non academic education, should be able to receive a doctoral title from the University of Lübeck, because the earnings of all the normal citizens guarantee the sum of the tax income, from which the former education minister gave the money to the University of Lübeck. She has absolutely no claim to this doctoral title, because she did not do anything except distribute grants that she did not earn.

By comparison: an entrepreneur who gives universities or other institutions money that they and their employees have earned, to such a remarkable extent that you can call it an extraordinary gesture, have always had the opportunity to receive an honorary doctorate, e.g. as a senator or as Doctor honoris causa. But mind you, this includes the creation of income, and from this taxes that the state can distribute. This is not simply a distribution of money from the earnings of others, as with the ex education minister for this doctoral title – and they should think about this Lübeck – there is no scientific or other performance. The only thing behind it for the ex education minister Schavan, is what the people created, and what for the most part party politics squandered away. And from the rest of the tax earnings after squandering and unsuccessful financial recovery, Ms Schavan distributed it and gave grants in certain directions. To be rewarded for this with a doctoral title, which was taken away from her with judicial approval by another university, is an audacity, perfidy and impertinence in the networking overall. Whether the ex education minister can be happy with this, is a question in itself, and indeed independent of being supported by the party politics, which also played a role in the case of Mr Guttenberg. In the case of the ex education minister, the church aspect is surely more emphasised, and if you look at the matter as a whole and then the party logo of the party that Ms Schavan comes from, then especially with regards to the future solution of problems of networking of church and state, for example via the party logos giving the sham appearance that Christians could be the best national representatives as a party, this is called into question even more, especially after it became clear to what extent squandering is going on, and that those who have squandered were granted a doctoral title, due to individual grants that could still be awarded. No, that can cause a feeling of disgust against this whole foul play. And if you consider that the Federal Chancellor Dr. Angela Merkel expressed her complete trust in various people, and then had to withdraw it, then the opposite question is raised, whether, if a large proportion of people express their trust in Dr. Angela Merkel when voting, as already pointed out here repeatedly by MfD, to become the chancellor, then the chancellor should also be obliged to resign. Such friendly services, regardless of how they follow connections, and actually due to the grants that are controlled via party political bodies and leaders, and not according to objective measures, mean that subjectively no decision can be made, i.e. they are no longer controllable, rather decisions should be made purely based on the facts, to avoid such results. If the University of Lübeck is of the opinion that – based on the statement of Ms Schavan, that she would consult her lawyer regarding how to proceed once the written version of the reasons for the judgement were available to them, and that she once again resolutely rejects the accusation of cheating – no conclusive further higher court verdict had been given but is to be expected due to Schavan’s statements and that thus there could be no prejudice until there was a higher court verdict and the University of Lübeck was therefore not bound to anything, then things would come to a head, and throw even more doubt onto such decision makers. At least the blatancy, that the university did not consider what the other one decreed, showed that the sense of decency, morals and ethics, i.e. values that apply to everyone, has been shaken, and especially in the university sector. The fact of using the money to be granted doctoral titles as an honorary doctor, or in connection with the title senator is generally practiced, e.g. when entrepreneurs who achieve something extraordinary with their staff and make donations to universities or provide their own income are honoured, but with the express indication that it is honorary or as a senator. Therefore, it is sufficiently indicated and is an income that is provided after it has been earned. The ex education minister Schavan, however, only controlled what resulted from the earnings of the whole population via tax money, whereby she did not make any contribution of her own apart from that of distribution. For this she did not even deserve an honorary doctorate, or a senator title. Because, if everyone would proceed like the decision makers at the University of Lübeck, then every citizen would have a claim to a "cheap" doctoral certificate, because they contributed a percentage of this grant money – even if only a small amount. But not the ex education minister, who received remuneration for her role, and now in the form of a life long pension. Can we take from the decision of the University of Lübeck, that in fact the whole population are the ones who have been conferred a doctorate, because they provide real services, even if this is only seen in a monetary regard from a university point of view? While those who plagiarised live from the income of the population. Thank you, University of Lübeck, for the doctoral certificate for every single citizen. The fact that this would be costly to send every citizen such a certificate is clear. But we should all feel as if we have been conferred a doctorate based on this decision, even if we do not place any importance on it, because throughout the nation, the significant people from management levels come into disrepute for having copied from others. The normal population will never experience this. We don't allow ourselves to be cheated, and we cheat relatively rarely. And definitely not for such a certificate. The MfDers hereby welcome the whole doctorate population. However, as we know that you did not get this certificate through university studies and examinations, we know that the approval of such a thesis is a result of false manoeuvring by executives without any decency or sense of values.
On the 2017 Federal Elections
No Restraint
The IMF
Trump’s Election is a Warning for Germany’s Political Parties
Year-End Selection of Texts
CDU Party Congress 2016
IMF Crisis Management a Failure
Deployment of the Bundeswehr in Germany
Crucial Test with International Implications
Ever Closer?
On the 2016 German State Elections
Revealed: Colossal Public Fraud in Germany and Europe
Nettlesome Politics
The Press
As We Begin 2016
Legal Action
Clever Shifting Tactics
New Charges in an Ongoing Saga
Evil under the Sun – The G20
Political Paradox
Game over for Merkel
The Greeks are making history
Clash of the Titans
Elmau
FIFA Roulette
The Beast Roars
The Silver Lining
Pulling in Opposite Directions
The Deafening Silence
Texts on the liquidation of the euro
Wasting Time
New Rules, Same Impetus
Call in the Army
Politicians Run from Themselves
Tax Policy Loopholes
Europa without the Euro
Alternative to the Euro
Hellas
Easter 2015
Deflation
Tidying Up
Insolvency Statute
Heiner Geißler
Germany Corrupt No More
India’s GDP growth
PEGIDA
Rescue Fever
Unbridled Power
Heaven on Earth
Getting down to the Nitty Gritty
1-0 in Favour of the Opposition
The Junk Currency
Oil War 2014
Golden Goodbye
The Ukraine Aid Debacle
World Tax Authority
Demonstrations in front of the ECB
Promises and Trust
Democratic Deficits
Nothing is safe
Fit for a Museum
At Christmas 2014
Family Voting Rights
Clueless Advisors
Pension Debacle
The Balanced Budget Lie
The Wimpy Currency
Acid Test
Two Very Different Issues
Who is Ruling the World?
More Clandestine Employees
The Recession Principle
Is This Really Better?
Kohl and Merkel
Debt Brake Debate
Reforms
Merkel and the democracy
Tax Losses
Totalitarian Collectivism
Regrettable Incident
Wulff’s Attorney Brings New Legal Action
The ECB in the Crossfire
Former Constitutional Judge Sceptical
A Lovely Gathering of VIPs?
German Banks Need Money
Stumbling Match
Deutsche Bank under Pressure
The Crow …
Papier‘s Morality
Shot in the Arm for the Economy
Political Crime Novel
ECB Soon to be the Eurozone‘s only Bad Bank
Demonstration for Democracy
Award for responsible action
Recommendations in case of a crash
Final move
European rating agency
The last elections
Hartz-IV is enough
Mr. Putin, please cry!
No longer worth anything
Free trade agreement
1st September 2014
The election in Saxony
Special European Summit
Bankers are counting on it
Debt cut á la state
Immigrants criticised
Unbelievable assets
Bundesbank closes Money Museum
Lawsuit against bank union
Only the penitent …
Sustainability
ECB stability report
Cowardly warriors
The financial industry has learnt nothing
Bribery of MP’s
They are also blind on 2.
The Stability Pact
Avoid Obama
Thoughts on Merkel's birthday
Megalomania’s children
Niebel’s Low Points
On László Andor’s speech
Snowden should say nothing
Reduction of interest rates
OECD report
A great blunder
Germany as a driver of growth?
Farewell, housing allowance
Sick health service
The EU Commission knows about popular deception
Draghi gives a warning
Self-praise stinks
A forced affair of the heart
Drawn from left to right
Hollywood
The aftermath of an election
65 years of the Basic Law
Hypocrisy
Who will save the life-insured?
Minimum wage
Minimum Wage I
Minimum Wage II
Minimum wage III
Minimum wages IV
The minimum wage V
Arise for revolution
The European elections are an act of dictatorship
Switzerland and Europe
Protection of the Constitution and services
The impossible triangle
The standard pension
Schäuble tricks again
The old “Welt”
The Union wears the trousers
Zeroes – commas – nothing!
Book publication
Court Condemns Politicians
The highest German court
Parties for the European election
Freedom of the press
Dispensation from obligations
European Elections
European election
The resurrection of "doctor" Schavan
Per capita assets
Federal Constitutional Court – Accrued gain and provision
ESM - ECB - the flood of debt
The hysterical Republic
Review proceedings against Wulff
The own goal of the High Court
Judges helpless
Schavan and zu Guttenberg
Human rights
Counterfeit money and false fifties
Fight against tax fraud?
New fellow citizens
So many ministers
Democracy the Turkish way
But will every European pay?
Data protection
Tax havens
Free Trade Agreement
Data thieves at work
Expropriation of the citizen
Soon without cash
NSA Investigation Committee
Dutch rating agencies
Officials in the German Bundestag
Snub for banks
Repeated deception of the people
De-dictatorisation
GroKo = Große Kosten (great costs)
The sluts of the SPD
What the grand coalition will present to us
Federal Public Prosecutor versus the NSA
The new “tithe”
The people’s sense of justice
Trauma of coalition negotiations
When will it finally come, the Constitution for the united Germany?
Investors and savers
Finally, Mr. Ströbele
Church and State
Left party politics
Is the Constitution democratically legitimised?
Needs must when the devil drives
Wiki-Leaks +
The CDU and its donors
State of emergency
High finance and party-politics
People and stock market
The person and their office
With full intent
Elections
Private retirement provision
It’s all about the quota
Deception over the Fiscal Pact
The failure of the government
Not really more money for the unemployed
Surpluses in health
Euro rescue by means of inflation
Asylum for the Chancellor
Discussion over democracy
Complaint against ...
The apparent vote ...
Courage, Mrs. Merkel!
Paid E-mailing
Only one month to go
Siegfried the Brave
Draghi wants more...
Fraud by forecast
Germany illegitimate
Election gifts
Left out
Youth unemployment
Public relations...
Leaders in politics
The rubble women
Every effort ...
Berlin Joint Welfare...
The casino of Cyprus
Ratings and bank union
A Conservative party...
Lies
Employees of public...
Bank union
lose links and ...
Democracy in Germany
Close-up
Our money is not safe
Out of order
More spirit of ...
TV duel
France in need
Finances in the ...
False average
The fight against corruption
Parliamentary absentees
Bravo, Mr. Weidmann!
At the end, Mrs. Lagarde?
On the subject of Cyprus
The wool has been ... I
The wool has been ... II
The problem of inertial ...
Schroeder’s homage
Gay marriage: only policy
Gauck
The budget in NRW was ...
Penalties for bankers
Bank bailout fund
The female quota
G-20
News about the Euro rescue
The war of the currencies
Stalemate in Italy
Merkel’s interests
NPD ban
Rating agencies
War-games again
S&P’s in the stocks
Political control
Mrs. Schavan, how...
Begging at a high level
Spain in the trend
Treaties between friends
Joint determination...
The most blatant lie...
Lower Saxony has...
Elections in Lower Saxony
Why have we called...
Something is rotten...
Secret agreements
Wulff has done...
MSK = DSK
Outcray against the ...
Politics is breaking ...
In the trap
The Target-2 system
Euro-political...
The Devil returns home
Members’ salaries
The last
Bankruptcy regulations...
The energy revolution
Bank rescue
Inactivity of the ...
So much eeriness at ...
Bad management is ...
Goodbye, Greece
General strike
Atlantis
Media in a fog
Euro Finance Week
The Berlin Bazaar
Careless love
The suffering basis...
Rescue packages ...
Election of the ...
ZDF
Steinbrück’s earnings
EU Summit in October
Aurea mediocritas
The veneering process
They have lied to us
All scapegoats together
Double accounting
Tour de force
Testament of poverty
Disservice
€ 8 more
In honour of Helmut Kohl
People have no respect
Nonsense and insanity
Pensions are not safe
Serial Merkel
Bad, bad, bad
People are not ...
Kohl’s merits
Deliberate false statements
Outwardly fine, inwardly...
DDBRD!
Gabriel goes underground?
Kohl’s Ghost
Hopeless bankruptcy delay
Open for business
Outcry against the ESM
2nd Outcry against the ESM
Fiscal Pact
Government bonds
ESM
Germany is bankrupt
Loss of democracy
Deception of investors
Merkel Referendum
The election in NRW
Ongoing election campaign
The aberrations of E. Pols
Speaking ban
Criminal complaints
Fear of publicity
Top experts
Real, direct democracy
Get rid of German President
Back-door politics
Competition for the office
Angela's wrinkles
Vultures gather
2011- System correction
Rating Agency Foundation
Contact men
Leading politicians
Transfer union
Membership fees
Referendum S21
Business–Banks–Politics
Misplaced doctors
State Trojan horses
Petitions ignored
The lever effect
Bonds by the ECB
Member states
No access
Political lobbyism
Conditions like in the East
Transparency
Sponsorship funds
Development aid
The transfer procedure
GER is doing itself away
Rescue packages
Supercrash in USA and EU
The 'Soli'-Lie
Vladimir Putin
A plea for direct democracy
Distrust of the Chancellor
More control
Flight of capital
Euro summit
It's war
The C in CDU and CSU
Deceit and lies
Germany getting screwed
Investments in countries
The illusion of a ...
General statements
Democracy-...-Dictatorship
GER-insurance society
Debt brake
Costs of members
Deceit and lies
Retirement provision
Medal of Freedom
Euro-thugs / Polit-thugs
We are the people
Security authorities
National debt and ...
Apology from the bankers
The Merkel Adventure
Party Competences
Chancellor
The East-Mark, ... ,Euro
Sister Merkel
Ruck-Rede & Oath of Office
The casino operation
Rescue Reactor
Euro rescue
Japan
spot
spot