share Recommend this site to a friend
deutsch deutsch
ALLIANCE FO§ DEMOCRACY
bombLetter to the IMF relation to the
Headbombno-value-ECM - 05/12/16
bombLetter to the CDU Youth Union - 14/11/16 bombLetter to the IDW regarding
Headbombthe EFSF’s Financial
HeadbombStatements – 19/10/16
Headbomb+ Correspondence IDW -> MFD 15/11/16
Headbomband MFD -> IDW 16/11/16
bombLetter to the european Financial
HeadbombSupervision relation to the
Headbombno-value-ECM - 03/10/16
bomb14th Letter to the Parliament for Judicial
HeadbombReview of the Free-Trade
HeadbombAgreements - 27/05/2016
bombApplication to the Constitutional
HeadbombCourt for Judicial Review of the
HeadbombFree-Trade Agreements - 27/05/2016
bombBILD - Pillory of Shame - 21/12/15 bombCriminal charge of making a false
Headbomballegation against netzpolitik.org - 17/09/2015
Headbomb+ response of Public Prosecutor in
HeadbombBerlin - 20/05/2016
bombLetter to the Ifo President - 05/11/14 bombComplaint to the German
HeadbombPress Council - 21/11/13
bombLetter to the IMF - 17/10/13
Headbomb+ Supplementary letter 22/11/13
bombLetter to the EU Commission - 17/10/13 bombLetter to the Presidium of the ECB - 17/10/13 bombAgainst the dismissal of
HeadbombFederal President Wulff - 13/06/13
Headbomb+ Response from the Hannover
HeadbombPublic Prosecutor's Office 25/07/13
Headbomb+ Opinion of the Alliance for
HeadbombDemocracy 21/08/13
Headbomb+ Letter to Celle General State Prosecutor’s
HeadbombOffice 10/10/13
bombPetition for the independence of the
HeadbombJudiciary and State Prosecutor - 06/05/13
Headbomb+ response by the Petitions Committee of
Headbombthe German Bundestag - 08/06/16
bombPetition for the introduction of genuine, direct
Headbombdemocracy - 25/04/13
Headbomb+ reply of the Bundestag - 14/11/16
bombPetition against corruption - 25/03/2013 bombCriminal complaint re. Target 2 10/11/2012 bomb1st Constitutional Complaint - against the
HeadbombFederal Government - 21/03/12
bomb2nd Constitutional Complaint - ESM incl.
Headbombsupplement - 12/06/12
bomb3rd Constitutional Complaint - ESM incl.
Headbombsupplement - 18/09/12
bomb4th Constitutional Complaint - Federal
HeadbombGouvernment against the ECB (by CJEU)
Headbomb27/09/12
Headbomb+ response of Federal
HeadbombConstitutional Court - 06/06/16
bombPress reports 27/6/12 + 24/10/12 bombSpringer complaint 28/09/11 bombDelayed insolvency bombPetition to the German Parliament 31/05/11 bombPetition to the European Parliament 21/06/11 bomb1st Letter to Members of Parliament 23/06/11 bomb2nd Letter to Members of Parliament
Headbomb26/09/11
bomb3rd Letter to Members of Parliament 19/05/12 bomb4th Letter to Members of Parliament 23/05/12 bomb5th Letter to Members of Parliament 20/06/12 bomb6th Letter to Members of Parliament 27/06/12 bomb7th Letter to the Parliament 27/9/12 bomb8th Letter to the Parliament 15/10/12 -
Headbombagainst Corruption 15/10/12 in addition to
HeadbombPetition 25/03/13
bomb9th Letter to the Parliament 24/10/12 bomb10th Letter to the Parliament 05/12/12 bomb11th Letter to the Parliament - 20/05/13 bomb12th Letter to the Parliament - 16/10/13 bomb13th Letter to the Parliament - 10/12/15 bombQuestions to the Bundestag 27/28/06/12 bombTo the members of the Bundesrat 14/06/12 bombTo the minister of finance 12/06/12 bombSecond Letter to the Finance
HeadbombMinister - 27/02/15
bombObjection to Hartz IV - Judicial Review
HeadbombComplaint BVerfG
bomb1st Lawsuit against Federal government
bomb21/03/11
bomb2nd Lawsuit against Federal government
bomb05/10/11
bombOpen letter 16/18/02/11





Per capita assets in the black (Springer); actually: in the red

The Springer Press has spoken recently in the Bild Zeitung for the umpteenth time about the monetary assets of the Germans. A detailed report, which also received several readers’ letters in response, who also reacted with incomprehension about this representation in terms of the personal situation.

Earlier, the statements made by the Bild Zeitung of the Springer Group about the per capita assets of the Germans had been considered critically and criticised very critical by us. And on the one hand they reported on average per capita assets of something over € 60.000,-- but at other times the figure was below € 60.000--. The criticism was based on unsustainability of these figures, because they relate to specified, but unrealistically calculated apparent per capita assets of the total population; this is made up to the level of 7.5 - 10% by very rich members of the population - people in high finance and big business, freelance professions and other very high-earning management personnel, who alone hold € 4,5 trillion of the total financial assets of over € 5 trillion; over 90% of total German financial assets are therefore in the hands of only 10% of the total population.

This means that around 72 to 73 million Germans, as normal citizens, hold a share of total German financial assets of up to max. € 500 billion, i.e. a share of only 1/9 of what this 10 % of the total population call their own.

This ratio becomes even worse if one converts the asset proportion of total financial assets of € 4.5 trillion for this 10% of the population, i.e. approx. 7 million people, into a per capita figure, and compares it with the above low per capita assets of the normal citizen: this results in an amount of not even 1%, and if one then deducts the debts below, which have not yet been accounted for, this then gives a ratio of unimaginable, infinite difference, namely between minus(!) €170,000 to minus(!) € 190,000 per capita of the normal population, compared to over plus(!) € 1 million per capita financial assets for the 7.5 - 10% of the rich population.

This alone proves the fact: we are once again in the hands of feudalism. The comment is allowed. The normal population, now as before, still lives in a dictatorship like slaves in relation to the rich.

Not to mention the declining income and pension levels in the future due to the mismanagement by party-politics, which has attracted no objectively reasonable criticism by the responsible press, nor criticism from the Press Council for failing to provide objective information to the people. Just one more sign that since the founding of the FRG, it has never been correct to speak of a legitimate state, which can and may call itself a democratic state under the rule of law, which would require unconditional transparency in every respect by means of publicity work in every direction, and which in any case should be subject to criticism by the press as a further controlling influence. The responsible Press Council, due to whatever motivation - which is not under examination here, has expressed no criticism on core issues and therefore it must be assumed either that it has no technical competence in such matters and thus he should be not entrusted with the assessment of whether or not objective press reporting is going on here, or that there are other motivations at work in the German Press Council which are causing it to remain inactive.

In this respect we had already lodged a complaint against the Press Council.

Reports were made earlier in the Springer press in the form of the above articles about the average per capita assets of the population, which have already come in for criticism; the correction was then made in the next, second report, that this referred to “calculated” per capita assets. “Calculated” per capita assets are of no interest at all; what is interesting are the assets in accordance with the actual conditions, and in this case, for the normal population, the assets of the super-rich cannot simply be included in the calculation, although this is what the Springer press has done several times.

On the other hand, even these figures would still be far too high without having to attract corresponding further criticism, when one takes into account an agency message to newspapers from late summer 2013, in which the average per capita financial assets of every citizen are given as only € 40,000, instead of the figure stated by the Springer press. All these reports and press information are incorrect, but have never attracted criticism - except from us readers and the Alliance for Democracy. According to the above statements, the positive per capita assets - without offsetting debts - of the normal citizen amount to a maximum of between € 6,500 and € 7,000 Euro - after almost 65 years of saving in the existing FRG. But this figure is also an incorrect and inaccurate figure, because none of the above figures take into account any offsetting or deduction of the total per capita share of the debt, which is the per capita share of all explicit and implicit deficits inherent in the statutory social system since the start of establishment of transfer (pay-as-you-go) systems compared to proper capital-funded entitlement coverage procedures on an actuarial basis. This alone produces a per capita share for the normal citizen, even before the reduction of the base interest rate, of the implicit debts in the statutory social security systems such as German pension insurance, statutory health insurance, German civil servants retirement provision with the corresponding cash entitlement values and cash values for ongoing, lifelong payments as well as limited cash value determination for all other benefits such as Hartz IV, i.e. allowances to the long-term unemployed under Unemployment Benefit II, care allowances, parental benefit etc. This completely neglects the high number of unclaimed Hartz IV payments (estimated claimants: over 2 million entitled persons, who could make claims at any time).

These implicit deficits, i.e. debts, even before the reduction of the base interest rate, come to a total amount of over € 10 trillion, which is still rising due to the interest rate reduction. Because the lower the calculated interest rate is set, the higher are the cash values, i.e. the debts for the payments in the statutory social systems, particularly of German pension insurance, but also in the calculation of the ageing reserves for the statutory health insurance in the form of deficits there.

The above implicit debts are increased by approximately 1/4, so that a total implicit debt level in the German statutory social systems of something over € 12 trillion can be assumed, which including the external debt produces a total volume of debt of over € 15 trillion. The implicit debt proportion alone, which after the base interest rate reduction and the associated interest rate reduction for the cash value calculation of ongoing, lifelong payments and also limited payments, therefore amounts to between at least € 170,000 and € 190,000 per capita, instead of the € 150,000 quoted so far, so that after offsetting the maximum financial asset share of € 7,000, the total level of debt per capita is something over minus(!) € 170,000 to minus(!) € 180,000, so therefore minus(!) assets instead of the immense amount claimed by the Springer press – if also “calculated” as giving the appearance without any justification. The calculations made by a leading German press publisher are most probably made for the purpose of the desired presentation, non-existent, excellent material circumstances of the Germans for the sham documentation of great party-politics and a non-recessive economy in advance of the European election, which is considered to be so important. The reader – and this was also shown by readers’ letters on this BILD article – is imply rendered speechless by such statements. How such stultification can be spread not only by party-politics, but also by criticism in the press, despite the controlling body of the German Press Council, would be almost unbelievable, if one could not directly check its falseness, as has been done.

Nor could it be presented more negatively in one report in a daily newspaper with a circulation of millions. The above implicit debts, which concern all citizens, whether or not they now receive benefits under the statutory social systems, are missing from the calculation of the quoted incorrect financial assets. And these per capita shares of the implicit debts in statutory social insurance systems and other systems using the pay-as-you-go procedure taken into account here, which are financed primarily from tax revenue, i.e. also by citizens who receive no payments at all under these systems, have arisen from a grave failing of party-politics, which was not taken up in the press, and as the first pay-as-you-go procedure concerning the statutory social insurance systems must be responsible for the state and federal civil service provision etc. Almost as a coup d’état of the first order. In order to declare something as a sham, which can never be financed under the existing conditions of the economy with regard to the allocation of its returns in an appropriate proportion between the employers and employees, namely to provide room for adequate contribution-financed payments from employer and employee contributions alone, i.e. no financing by contributions took place, although it should have been. And there are now trillions of Euro in deficits, for which contribution financing to be able to cover the required financing from employees is completely unsupportable from future working income, and for which the burdening with employer contributions cannot be expected from business as employer contributions, because party-politics has failed to provide for this, which offers evidence that the automatically resulting room for working income and contributions for social security is much too restricted, in which the transfer-financed alleged social security provided for party-political purposes does not fit, and to this extent is only promised as a sham. Due to this sham transfer procedure, social security in the FRG is non-existent: pensions are not safe. The District Court of Berlin also subscribed to this point of view when it decided that despite pension reductions in the context of the previous ownership guarantee, pensions were still not safe even if they were reduced to one Euro monthly pension amount. This means that as long as anything at all was paid, politics could claim that “pensions are safe”. This resulted in something above and beyond an omitted appeal of the Springer publishers to its consciously party-lobbyist advertisement, which was for political press lobbyist purposes, although it would have been possible for them to institute opposition proceedings at little cost. Then even the ownership guarantee was retracted on the basis of earlier decisions by the Federal Constitutional Court by a new decision of this court for large areas, namely predominantly tax-financed pensions, and therefore for all retirement and dependents’ provisions under German pension insurance, all civil service provisions etc., with the possibility of reduction to the minimum subsistence level (or for civil servants to an equivalent alimentation).

With that, there is nothing more to be said with regard to social security in the FRG. It does not exist. And on this was superimposed yet a second transfer system by the Merkel government, a rescue package liability construct for the rescue of the Euro, for the creation of a second transfer system in which each in itself can mean national bankruptcy in a legislature period. But even without these transfer systems, in the event of their elimination, Germany as a country is bankrupt from every economic point of view. It is delaying its insolvency by having itself supported by its citizens, and even gives prohibited aid, again via its citizens and their support, to delay the insolvency of other bankrupt countries of the EMU, even though Germany itself and also four other spuriously supporting countries are also bankrupt.

And now it must be noted that the FRG is a dictatorship, and that Euro-dictatorship has been common parlance for a matter of years. The FRG is a leader on issues of the Euro and Europe, and also in the creation of the European Treaty (Lisbon 2008) and also jointly and chiefly responsible for major points of its implementation conditions (TFEU). And with this influence of an FRG dictatorship and according to common parlance, the institutional machinations of European institutions such as the EU Commission, the ECB and even the European Court of Justice, because of demonstrably partial jurisdiction, can only be referred to as European dictatorship. What else could result from the European election for the united Europe, if a fundamentally new constitution does not provide the required conditions for the creation of a united Europe by European elections? No different than in the FRG and Europe do we need a second lying Chancellor and another lying parliament according to the model of the FRG and its Public Prosecutors and jurisdiction, where the highest German judges at the Federal Constitutional Court said in their current verdict of the ESM of 18.03.2014 that within the scope of democratic principles, possible further debts could still be covered by liabilities, although this is not allowed by the Basic Law, so that this would be a matter of prohibited state financing. How can the highest judges and their President at the highest German Court pass judgement on democracy, budgetary sovereignty and corresponding tolerable limits within the framework of a democracy, if there has been neither a democracy nor a state under the rule of law in the FRG since 1949, but demonstrably a non-democracy and dictatorship, only an illegitimate state instead of a legitimate state.

The issue no longer arises whether Germany is open to Europe, or Europe should be open to Germany. This question has already been clearly answered by the highest judges.

Now back to the Springer press: contrary to what the Springer press says, every new-born comes into the world with a debt created by the most destructive debt policy of all time in the last 65 years, and now with a debt burden in the order of size of between minus € 160,000 to minus € 180,000, instead of the “calculated” level of assets which they should have if one were to believe the Springer press. No securities exist with banks – the equity capital quotas are much too low – even after being increased; the only security is the working income of the current and future generations, which will go to paying the interest and the principal debt. And this applies for both transfer systems (social insurance systems and rescue package liabilities for the rescue of the Euro). The level of mismanagement could not get any worse. And when one considers that in an opinion survey only a few years ago, 34% of the population ascribed the greatest economic competence to the C-parties, who were in government for most of this time (over 60%), but then proved themselves to be equally incompetent, then everything is turned onto its head, in the absence of any criticism from the press, which should exert a correcting influence by providing objective information to citizens in all respects, so that they can make sensible election decisions from the citizen’s point of view. All this is however only possible because we have not been living in a democracy since 1949 – this has been dished up to us against better knowledge – but in a dictatorship, which has been created by deception of the people by the major popular parties, and instead of serving, excluded the domination of people of the FRG by the deputy sovereign – the co-determination of the people at the national level - therefore the actual sovereign – and usurped their legal position, and then demonstrated that as a servant it was unable to manage affairs reasonably like professional businessmen, and therefore, as in countries where control of all power exists (including political power) – i.e. with genuine, direct democracy – must be controlled, which should have been considered and realised at a much earlier stage, namely by a new constitution, which has already been promised to all Germany for almost 25 years, but has never been realised, in order to be able to maintain this absence of co-determination by the people. Neither politics nor the party-political lobbyist press is to be heard. The people must judge, and no longer judgements which are signed in the name of the people, but never correspond to the will of the people, because they are judgements which are brought about by investigation proceedings which bend the law, in criminal proceedings conducted by public prosecutors acting under instructions, and at the highest level of jurisdiction by the highest Federal courts and the Federal Constitutional Court, by judges who are less than impartial, and where party-political injustice is often transformed into justice.

If we have to accept this repeated “calculated” representation of the Springer press, it is because this would otherwise convey a completely false picture for the voters with regard to the forthcoming European elections. This was probably exactly what was intended with the last BILD article, in order to draw attention to a blossoming Germany as an even better business location by the acclaimed, alleged situation of its citizens, which in fact does not exist, despite the failed party/press lobbyism. A blossoming, instead of the actual withering of the national economy of the FRG is intended to mislead the readers, in order to make a similar show to the people of the desired Europe on the basis of such an excellent state of Germany. It is thereby overlooked how lamentable the situation really is in the FRG. Nowhere does anyone report on the costs of delaying insolvency which must be found by the citizens for their own country, and its aid towards delaying the insolvency of other bankrupt European countries. Not by the EU Commission, nor by the International Monetary Fund, nor in the concerted economic policy division between the governments of the national EMU countries and the European Central Bank, because it appears better to them to lie and conceal by the absence of reporting, rather than to disclose the genuine figures relating to the real overall situation. In Germany alone, the citizens must find as much money as one to two complete national budgets, in order to allow party-politics to survive with their support. This amounts to a figure of at least between € 300 and € 600 billion annually. And all this takes place with regard to Germany under the responsibility of the German Chancellor, who has recently once again emphasised the independence of such institutions responsible for monetary stability (in particular the ECB), although networked party political dependency demonstrably exists. There is one possibility, and this is being investigated at the moment, of bringing these abuses to the attention of the EMU populations, officially and with appropriate emphasis, from an independent perspective. Even if under current jurisdiction there is no possibility of putting a stop to them, as long as this is not ensured by new constitutions. The result of all traceability is that the welfare and interests of the citizens are no longer pursued in any way due to the networking and the established dependencies of party politics, and still receive press lobbyist support through negative behaviour. All citizens, irrespective of their positions in the normal population, due to the high negative asset levels, have been turned into failures of a demonstrably lying and feudalistic society in the dictatorship existing in the FRG since 1949, which under all Chancellors and the highest courts never admitted the exclusion of co-determination of the people at the national level, and never made any effort to put right the deception of the people, in which the representative usurped the power, i.e. excluded the co-determination of the real sovereign, the people, in order to maintain and extend their power. This was deliberate intent, which even until the present date has not been corrected by revealing and getting rid of the deception; in all other areas of co-existence, such deliberate deception is punishable, like any other form of deliberate misappropriation.

Further neglected obligations which should have been complied with by politics, namely that of establishing the framework for all other controlling areas of power, as would have been necessary by co-determination of the people as a control of power politics by means of a policy to be actually would have been, namely the setting fiefdoms, such as this because of Constitution were not fulfilled, which then resulted particularly in the unjust setting of impossible, comprehensible, ongoing classifications regarding emergency support measures. And also resulting from the lowest to the highest working incomes, more than problematic contradictions which still have not been tackled until today, despite or particularly because of the Agenda 2010. These contradictions, which also arose later in connection with aspects of the minimum wage, and which continue to exist over the whole income scale right up to the level of management salaries, must inevitably suffer from this unsolved problem, because they were never resolved by party-politics by a fair social division of company returns in an appropriate ratio which took employees into account. These also concern the emergency support measures orientated along the lines of the minimum subsistence level in the case of a working income development tiered upwards. In terms of criticism and recognition of the omissions of party politics regarding the income system, this recently became the burning issue in advance of the European elections, in order to be brought to an apparent but unsustainable resolution as quickly as possible by the government coalition in the FRG, and its introduction was passed from 1.1.2015. Nothing has been resolved however, and the problem has simply been removed from the table before the elections. The problem still exists, and urgently requires an appropriate solution, which however can only be tackled by a different division of company returns, which is in any case essential, because the previous, automatic distribution had never accounted for the social security which could not be financed by employee contributions, and apparently did not also give rise to employer obligations, so that for the lack of financing capability of promised social security, this was nothing more than a bubble, which must set businessmen and their policy in a light in which they do not want to see themselves. On the other hand, they have demonstrated in a similar way that they think nothing of a social order for the total population, including genuine security regarding social security as socially compliant, and a reliable financing regime, but only in the unacceptable sense, as repeatedly touted by the Chancellor of the FRG, to believe to be able to demand from people market-compliant behaviour with all the imposed faults at the most sensitive point, namely that of social security, and to be able to deceive and mislead them with give-away policies, because they will have to pay for these “gifts” themselves, although it was clear that they will never be able to afford them. Such a policy is of no use either to the FRG or a united Europe, and will also not be accepted by the voters. In summary, this means that nothing at all can be settled by minimum wages. Nor anything at all with regard to social security by the example of the FRG; these are stillbirths, which the press should have reported in quite a different manner. Such questions will never be completely settled such cementations such unresolved issues, seemingly to achieve more favourable moods ahead of the elections, because such procedures are merely cheating. There is an infinite need for action concerning the fact that things cannot be left as they are, but the encrustations must be broken up, and things must be renewed from the ground up. There is a need for reform, which the loser tradition of conservative thinkers can no longer be sufficient even with Christian thought and hope. Both the minimum wage problem and the problem of both transfer systems must be reason enough to finally and actively put an end to the need for change by tackling the change of the basic concepts and overcoming the mentality of failure and mismanagement, i.e. in giving the voter something new by voting through other voting initiatives. Short term solutions such as those currently being suggested for the minimum wage problem, are nothing but a party political bluff for dummies. The voters have experienced enough stultification.

If this is not resolved the question will arise for party members and also trade union members, as to whether to remain a member but cease paying contributions, if acute problems are simply killed off and no real solution is introduced. There are corresponding examples in the Piratenpartei party, where members ceased paying contributions, but claimed to still be members and still are.

Regarding the party membership contributions, such rethinking is advisable in any case, because these contributions have been paid for decades, in the belief that in this way you are supporting a democratic constitutional state, only to discover that with your contributions, apart from the legal party financing and donations to parties, you are promoting a mock democratic illegitimate state as a dictatorship, and this can in no way be reconciled with the member concerns. Because the party base has been deceived and lied to by their elected leaders, because their paid membership did not correspond to their interests regarding a democratic constitutional state, rather they were only being deceived. These questions reach as far as the churches, and the church tax to be paid, which it will no longer be possible to maintain over the course of time. The church assets alone without further church tax payments by the state, already corresponds to the whole German financial assets for 72-73 million citizens, saved over almost 65 years, without having offset the total implicit debt percentage from non financed legal social systems, civil service pensions and external debt. At the last look the normal population has a huge minus amount of money, while the church has positive assets of over € 0.5 trillion. In this republic things are no longer right, all across the board.

In this regard, the election manifesto statements by the large people's parties are nothing more than an attempt to show themselves in a better light, from the quagmire in which they generated a minus, once again via pretences about the European circle of indebted national states. Even this is only a sham. The European voters should seriously think about abstention or deselection or protest vote.

The voter should consider that all party politics which is decisive for the EMU countries have significantly squandered away their countries and despite of these results they hope to make clear to the voter that they are in a position to lead a healthy, united Europe. From the first this is an impossible sham appearance, because right from the start all of these countries are bankrupt countries, and you can hardly make anything out of bankruptcy except more bankruptcy, which can only lead to even greater bankruptcy. As has already happened in the national states, apart from the fabrications of the national budgets such as in the FRG, France, Spain, Italy and Finland, via the exclusion of liabilities of the citizens, and their separation from the national budgets.

The fact that this has developed to the current state in relation to the FRG, is due to the following:

- The party politics basked for too long without excellent performances, in which due to fantastical financial planning by them with too high growth rates for the future in the planning and furthermore high debt rates per year, money flooding occurred, which enabled everything (highest profits) for the company and much for employees in spite of too low frameworks, but only on credit. The overdrawing of credit, which is only exemplified in the fact that the nominal debts are even increasing with a consistent percentual debt, requires no further remarks, if we proceed in the same way as party political dreamers, who completely disregard the principles of proper sales people regarding economic and financial policy and social security, yet can live parasitically and only have to perform real roles, but not in the sense of positive services, when they were squandered due to these arrogances, and were obliged to undertake remediation, their own remediation, but could not even provide remediation, which otherwise would only be left to external remediators with the appropriate objective outsiders, who have nothing to do with the squandering. The dictatorship arrogance of the serving representative sovereign led to this predicament, which can only be solved in the short term due to the concerted efforts between the governments of the national states with the leadership of the European Central Bank due to a new money flood, which the party politics can once again float along on as well as the self caused money flood created by credit financed growth. However, consciously due to a flood which makes existing money weaker, if the flood is not retracted in good time. So living and surviving party politics just through money flooding in a no longer correct abundance of money. And this leads to the networking of items in institutions that should actually be independent, which need to be independent, but due to their networking show total dependence, especially in the division of the economic policy amongst them, contrary to current claims from the German Federal Chancellor on the example of the ECB. And also with regards to non adherence to money value stability when lowering the returns for savings due to base rate cuts, where the ECB, the IWF and the Bank for International Settlements as a sub organisation of the latter two, are not complying with the UN's aims to ensure money value stability. If this concertedly does not happen, then only because of the existential dependence of people on party politics, who for their part determine how taxes from the earned income of the population is distributed and these institutions with their networked management personalities will benefit. I.e. nothing happens as a result of these networks which has to happen in the interest of the people. This relates to total party political networking of crown prosecutors and independent, but party agreeable appointed judges, who have the opportunity to decide in favour of parties. The citizen is powerless against this, because these networks relate to the highest addressable courts, and there are none of these superordinate party independent supervisory bodies, who can exert their influence in a regulatory manner over such kinship, as it is otherwise only possible via real direct democratically oriented country constitutions, which all spheres of influence check, and do not allow injustices to remain unjust, rather are in a position to make it right via referendum and decisions taken by the people. As long as these kinds of constitutions do not exist, nothing more can be expected from a united Europe, if a corresponding constitution can not be applicable in the scope of the party political programme, than this untenable state of affairs from the point of view of the people, as has arisen in the FRG for almost 65 years. This European election is of significant importance, and therefore it has already manifested itself for the corruption present in the FRG, which has not already been got under control - not even by the most recent changes regarding certain consequences in a penal regard, in the case of punishable behaviour even for members of parliament, rather it requires a general regulation, if it is not to be in the principles, that should a component for the European election, which will lead to a united Europe, which independently from the lowering of the performance level in this Euro - bankrupt Europe will lead to unacceptable circumstances, as we were offered on a party political basis and as an example of this for the whole population nationally, and which is why the decadence of all the constitutional organisations of the FRD are actually based on the fact that values of their leaders have been heading South for a long time now.

This is not likely to change, but will continue to get worse, if top failures mean to lead a big, united Europe in the scope of a new world order and even should so.
On the 2017 Federal Elections
No Restraint
The IMF
Trump’s Election is a Warning for Germany’s Political Parties
Year-End Selection of Texts
CDU Party Congress 2016
IMF Crisis Management a Failure
Deployment of the Bundeswehr in Germany
Crucial Test with International Implications
Ever Closer?
On the 2016 German State Elections
Revealed: Colossal Public Fraud in Germany and Europe
Nettlesome Politics
The Press
As We Begin 2016
Legal Action
Clever Shifting Tactics
New Charges in an Ongoing Saga
Evil under the Sun – The G20
Political Paradox
Game over for Merkel
The Greeks are making history
Clash of the Titans
Elmau
FIFA Roulette
The Beast Roars
The Silver Lining
Pulling in Opposite Directions
The Deafening Silence
Texts on the liquidation of the euro
Wasting Time
New Rules, Same Impetus
Call in the Army
Politicians Run from Themselves
Tax Policy Loopholes
Europa without the Euro
Alternative to the Euro
Hellas
Easter 2015
Deflation
Tidying Up
Insolvency Statute
Heiner Geißler
Germany Corrupt No More
India’s GDP growth
PEGIDA
Rescue Fever
Unbridled Power
Heaven on Earth
Getting down to the Nitty Gritty
1-0 in Favour of the Opposition
The Junk Currency
Oil War 2014
Golden Goodbye
The Ukraine Aid Debacle
World Tax Authority
Demonstrations in front of the ECB
Promises and Trust
Democratic Deficits
Nothing is safe
Fit for a Museum
At Christmas 2014
Family Voting Rights
Clueless Advisors
Pension Debacle
The Balanced Budget Lie
The Wimpy Currency
Acid Test
Two Very Different Issues
Who is Ruling the World?
More Clandestine Employees
The Recession Principle
Is This Really Better?
Kohl and Merkel
Debt Brake Debate
Reforms
Merkel and the democracy
Tax Losses
Totalitarian Collectivism
Regrettable Incident
Wulff’s Attorney Brings New Legal Action
The ECB in the Crossfire
Former Constitutional Judge Sceptical
A Lovely Gathering of VIPs?
German Banks Need Money
Stumbling Match
Deutsche Bank under Pressure
The Crow …
Papier‘s Morality
Shot in the Arm for the Economy
Political Crime Novel
ECB Soon to be the Eurozone‘s only Bad Bank
Demonstration for Democracy
Award for responsible action
Recommendations in case of a crash
Final move
European rating agency
The last elections
Hartz-IV is enough
Mr. Putin, please cry!
No longer worth anything
Free trade agreement
1st September 2014
The election in Saxony
Special European Summit
Bankers are counting on it
Debt cut á la state
Immigrants criticised
Unbelievable assets
Bundesbank closes Money Museum
Lawsuit against bank union
Only the penitent …
Sustainability
ECB stability report
Cowardly warriors
The financial industry has learnt nothing
Bribery of MP’s
They are also blind on 2.
The Stability Pact
Avoid Obama
Thoughts on Merkel's birthday
Megalomania’s children
Niebel’s Low Points
On László Andor’s speech
Snowden should say nothing
Reduction of interest rates
OECD report
A great blunder
Germany as a driver of growth?
Farewell, housing allowance
Sick health service
The EU Commission knows about popular deception
Draghi gives a warning
Self-praise stinks
A forced affair of the heart
Drawn from left to right
Hollywood
The aftermath of an election
65 years of the Basic Law
Hypocrisy
Who will save the life-insured?
Minimum wage
Minimum Wage I
Minimum Wage II
Minimum wage III
Minimum wages IV
The minimum wage V
Arise for revolution
The European elections are an act of dictatorship
Switzerland and Europe
Protection of the Constitution and services
The impossible triangle
The standard pension
Schäuble tricks again
The old “Welt”
The Union wears the trousers
Zeroes – commas – nothing!
Book publication
Court Condemns Politicians
The highest German court
Parties for the European election
Freedom of the press
Dispensation from obligations
European Elections
European election
The resurrection of "doctor" Schavan
Per capita assets
Federal Constitutional Court – Accrued gain and provision
ESM - ECB - the flood of debt
The hysterical Republic
Review proceedings against Wulff
The own goal of the High Court
Judges helpless
Schavan and zu Guttenberg
Human rights
Counterfeit money and false fifties
Fight against tax fraud?
New fellow citizens
So many ministers
Democracy the Turkish way
But will every European pay?
Data protection
Tax havens
Free Trade Agreement
Data thieves at work
Expropriation of the citizen
Soon without cash
NSA Investigation Committee
Dutch rating agencies
Officials in the German Bundestag
Snub for banks
Repeated deception of the people
De-dictatorisation
GroKo = Große Kosten (great costs)
The sluts of the SPD
What the grand coalition will present to us
Federal Public Prosecutor versus the NSA
The new “tithe”
The people’s sense of justice
Trauma of coalition negotiations
When will it finally come, the Constitution for the united Germany?
Investors and savers
Finally, Mr. Ströbele
Church and State
Left party politics
Is the Constitution democratically legitimised?
Needs must when the devil drives
Wiki-Leaks +
The CDU and its donors
State of emergency
High finance and party-politics
People and stock market
The person and their office
With full intent
Elections
Private retirement provision
It’s all about the quota
Deception over the Fiscal Pact
The failure of the government
Not really more money for the unemployed
Surpluses in health
Euro rescue by means of inflation
Asylum for the Chancellor
Discussion over democracy
Complaint against ...
The apparent vote ...
Courage, Mrs. Merkel!
Paid E-mailing
Only one month to go
Siegfried the Brave
Draghi wants more...
Fraud by forecast
Germany illegitimate
Election gifts
Left out
Youth unemployment
Public relations...
Leaders in politics
The rubble women
Every effort ...
Berlin Joint Welfare...
The casino of Cyprus
Ratings and bank union
A Conservative party...
Lies
Employees of public...
Bank union
lose links and ...
Democracy in Germany
Close-up
Our money is not safe
Out of order
More spirit of ...
TV duel
France in need
Finances in the ...
False average
The fight against corruption
Parliamentary absentees
Bravo, Mr. Weidmann!
At the end, Mrs. Lagarde?
On the subject of Cyprus
The wool has been ... I
The wool has been ... II
The problem of inertial ...
Schroeder’s homage
Gay marriage: only policy
Gauck
The budget in NRW was ...
Penalties for bankers
Bank bailout fund
The female quota
G-20
News about the Euro rescue
The war of the currencies
Stalemate in Italy
Merkel’s interests
NPD ban
Rating agencies
War-games again
S&P’s in the stocks
Political control
Mrs. Schavan, how...
Begging at a high level
Spain in the trend
Treaties between friends
Joint determination...
The most blatant lie...
Lower Saxony has...
Elections in Lower Saxony
Why have we called...
Something is rotten...
Secret agreements
Wulff has done...
MSK = DSK
Outcray against the ...
Politics is breaking ...
In the trap
The Target-2 system
Euro-political...
The Devil returns home
Members’ salaries
The last
Bankruptcy regulations...
The energy revolution
Bank rescue
Inactivity of the ...
So much eeriness at ...
Bad management is ...
Goodbye, Greece
General strike
Atlantis
Media in a fog
Euro Finance Week
The Berlin Bazaar
Careless love
The suffering basis...
Rescue packages ...
Election of the ...
ZDF
Steinbrück’s earnings
EU Summit in October
Aurea mediocritas
The veneering process
They have lied to us
All scapegoats together
Double accounting
Tour de force
Testament of poverty
Disservice
€ 8 more
In honour of Helmut Kohl
People have no respect
Nonsense and insanity
Pensions are not safe
Serial Merkel
Bad, bad, bad
People are not ...
Kohl’s merits
Deliberate false statements
Outwardly fine, inwardly...
DDBRD!
Gabriel goes underground?
Kohl’s Ghost
Hopeless bankruptcy delay
Open for business
Outcry against the ESM
2nd Outcry against the ESM
Fiscal Pact
Government bonds
ESM
Germany is bankrupt
Loss of democracy
Deception of investors
Merkel Referendum
The election in NRW
Ongoing election campaign
The aberrations of E. Pols
Speaking ban
Criminal complaints
Fear of publicity
Top experts
Real, direct democracy
Get rid of German President
Back-door politics
Competition for the office
Angela's wrinkles
Vultures gather
2011- System correction
Rating Agency Foundation
Contact men
Leading politicians
Transfer union
Membership fees
Referendum S21
Business–Banks–Politics
Misplaced doctors
State Trojan horses
Petitions ignored
The lever effect
Bonds by the ECB
Member states
No access
Political lobbyism
Conditions like in the East
Transparency
Sponsorship funds
Development aid
The transfer procedure
GER is doing itself away
Rescue packages
Supercrash in USA and EU
The 'Soli'-Lie
Vladimir Putin
A plea for direct democracy
Distrust of the Chancellor
More control
Flight of capital
Euro summit
It's war
The C in CDU and CSU
Deceit and lies
Germany getting screwed
Investments in countries
The illusion of a ...
General statements
Democracy-...-Dictatorship
GER-insurance society
Debt brake
Costs of members
Deceit and lies
Retirement provision
Medal of Freedom
Euro-thugs / Polit-thugs
We are the people
Security authorities
National debt and ...
Apology from the bankers
The Merkel Adventure
Party Competences
Chancellor
The East-Mark, ... ,Euro
Sister Merkel
Ruck-Rede & Oath of Office
The casino operation
Rescue Reactor
Euro rescue
Japan
spot
spot