ALLIANCE FO§ DEMOCRACY

What the grand coalition will present to us

The two major political parties are parties of popular deception. Even of the founding of the State in 1949, they ruled out the co-determination of the people as sovereign. They have also created a formal law on the basis of an immoral basic law, which enables them to act without regard to the people, and above all to set party-political goals. To achieve this, the press was influenced and Public Prosecutors and judges were bound by instructions. They themselves did not confer this right, because they are biased and cover up party-political machinations. Thus, they have betrayed the law as the basis for the order of the State and have given politics the influence and the means which are incompatible with a democracy. In this way, Germany has declined to the position of an illegitimate state.
Criminal and constitutional complaints from the people are unfairly rejected with the argument that “The individual is not affected” in popular matters; or, if the accusation or complaint is accepted, it is then rejected.
All this legal obfuscation is based again and again by the Federal Constitutional Court on the often-cited freedom of discretion, which however has little to do with reasonable discretion (§315 BGB), which requires that the judgement made must not be founded on unilateral interests, but must be made taking into account all the facts fairly, and should be of use to both sides. The Federal Constitutional Court grants freedom of action to politics, which lacks the limitations of the principle of proportionality applicable under formal law, and the people gain hardly any benefit from the regulations. We should at this point recall in particular the ESM, which forces the people to put their money into rescue packages, in order to support Euro countries which have long since been bankrupt, in addition to other taxes levied by the State, which then simply overdraws the budget once again, and continues to finance it by means of borrowing.
In Germany, party-political injustice holds sway, which is transformed into alleged law by the highest courts through the Constitution; where justice is placed on an equal footing with injustice, solely for reasons of the retention of power, and against the interests and to the exclusion of the people, while yet still “In the name of the people”.
The parties, in particular the C-parties, had from the very beginning, under the guise of a market economy, which proved itself to be too free for business and not in the interests of the employees, the maxim that profit was the sole purpose of the economy. They have thereby made themselves the henchmen of the economy and high finance.
No Chancellor has ever been independent in their actions on behalf of the people. It was always the economy or high finance, which kept the politicians as puppets, in order to make profit. The people were at best guarantors for the misdeeds, such as, for example, the communitisation of the liability costs for the alleged rescue of the Euro.
The incomprehensible thing about this was always that all of these parties stepped forward to support their interests and to expand the democratic rule of law. At least it sounds like that in some party or election programmes. Apparently though there were some responsible, who the higher they climbed in office, the more they forgot the lofty goals and fell from grace and acted unjustly in the dilemma between necessity, interests of others and the preservation of power.
In earlier times, some politicians gave up their offices when they were caught committing such injustice; Otto Graf Lambsdorff taught politics however that this honourable approach is unnecessary. Today there is a yawning gap between the members of the party, the so-called grass roots, who probably believe in the party programmes and its objectives and work towards them, and those higher up, who betray these goals. The management personnel of a company have to meet certain qualifications; they must not only be prepared to abandon their decency and their dignity like politicians, who afford themselves every latitude in the self-created law free area, while the people as the sovereign are sidelined.
In this sense, a new Constitution, which protects the people against such politicians, must be the overriding aim. It is high time for politics to look after these interests, and to return to the people the sovereignty to which it is entitled. The deprivation of the influence of the people on politics cannot be allowed to continue; nor freedoms or effronteries as evidenced by the quotation from Konrad Adenauer: “I am dictatorship, only with a strong democratic bias.” The father of the country has had his day; no woman on Earth has less maternity about her than Angela Merkel. As long the country wants to call itself democratic, democracy in Germany must above all become a system that makes it possible for the people to play a determining role, which is what the word democracy actually means.
Unfortunately, all Chancellors after Adenauer have overlooked this. They also lacked morality and decency. Politics is a façade, a mirage, a mask. No Chancellor saw his task as manifesting the co-determination of the people, not even Willy Brandt. Injustice was never corrected. Secret agreements which were signed by Adenauer are still in force: the eavesdropping law, the stationing law (of foreign troops), the emergency law and the secret service law. These laws prevent Germany from becoming independent and developing freely and democratically. This would have required above all education, enlightenment and especially political work. Anybody who was interested however would have noticed very quickly that in politics, the main consideration is the party line and the preservation of power. In this way politicians may have found a purpose in life; but the people however cannot develop in this way.
All of this was probably undesirable - the German enemy should remain the enemy, may remain occupied, bugged, controlled and spied on, as is just right. The people have no protection; politics is vulnerable. This is instead suppressed by politics and replaced with the lie that politics is concerned with improving the lot of the people. By no means.
In literature, Friedrich Schiller emphasised that the supreme evil or really evil person is the one who tolerates evil. From this point of view, a continuous increase of evil in political leaders can be discerned after Adenauer, although even this is put into the shade by Angela Merkel. In her vain attempts to save the Euro, she has taken it upon herself to throw away the wealth and assets of the people, and to lead the country into bankruptcy, or to keep it always on the verge of bankruptcy, at the cost of the taxpayer. In addition, the State pays huge fees to consultants, who are supposed to balance the budget, but never manage to do so. So Finance Minister Schäuble is lying when he speaks of soon being able to finance the national budget without borrowing. In several articles, we have also drawn attention to the tricks which are necessary for this purpose. What remains is nothing more than the robbery of the people. Taxes which the state levies everywhere, and charges which ensure that money still continues to flow into the yawning treasuries of the Euro community. Money which no German taxpayer will ever see again, or money that will only go to the benefit of the state. It is handed out in order to preserve the position of those in power; there will be, there cannot be, any return. The Euro rescue is the greatest deception of all time. The damage is irreparable. There must be controls, on all provinces of power and independence of the state. Social conformity must be the watchword, and not market conformity, which Chancellor Merkel holds up as the universal panacea. Because Mrs. Merkel forgets one thing, and this is the most essential, the relationship between the financial asset share of the super-rich of between 7.5 and 10% of the total population, and the financial asset share which remains for the other 90 to 92.5% of the total population. From the point of view of the proportionality of these figures alone, this clearly demonstrates the disproportionality allowed to governments by the Federal Constitutional Court, up to the point of unrestricted freedom of discretion and freedom of action, which have led to the fact that a social system which can form the basis of a social order in a sense most in conformity with society has been abused, and has been replaced by a party policy of informers which simply fulfils the wishes of the economy. The survival of the delayed insolvency of the state cannot be the task of politics, nor is it in the interests of the people. If the coalitionists still agree however that they can infringe this with their policies, the coalition is unsupportable. Measured against the experiences of other governments however, we unfortunately cannot expect anything else, and are forced to wait and see how severe will be the damage which this government will be prepared to inflict.
A coalition must be a dispute partner in the interests of the people. Equality of treatment however, despite the alleged different objectives in the representation of the interests of voters and party members, prohibits a grand coalition and particularly so since nothing more than a coalition agreement has been reached, since the election on 22nd September 2012, which is based only on empty words, party programmes and follies. To allow oneself so many weeks time, and then to come up with such a sorry effort, cannot be permissible, and must serve other interests, such as the outsourcing of the tasks and responsibilities of politics to EU institutions such as the ECB or the European Commission, or the International Monetary Fund. They now decide what is to happen in Germany – a government is therefore outdated, unnecessary and has had its day. As in the case of the secure savings on which the Euro vultures are bent, the Germans learn nothing of such plans. The press, if it ever bothers to investigate at all, is bypassed or muzzled; law and order are not attacked, because no measures or laws against such a state takeover are provided. The doors are left wide open to the Euro gang, while Merkel and Co. give away everything that the people still possess. Decency and morality are lost in the rush, but nobody cries about this, because politics cannot be assumed to have any decency or morality.
A large majority in the Bundestag means excessive power in the Bundesrat, no trembling during Euro votes because of stupid dissenters, no FDP, which accuses the Union of social democratisation. Merkel may score points with uncomfortable social issues, which are welcome with voters, but contradict profit interests, such as the Transaction Tax, the minimum wage or the rent freeze. Anyone in the CDU/CSU team who remains recalcitrant, is pacified with the argument that such an alliance would be just as painful. But it will be the people above all who suffer the pain, because once the coalitionists have secured for themselves the best places, they will once again be able to dictate to the people.
Mrs Merkel is lying when she says nothing about what she really intends to do with the savings of the Germans, or simply leaves the responsibility to her Euro cronies, and she is lying when she says that there would be no tax increases. There must be tax increases - there is no other way of getting around the mountain of debt or maintain the delaying of insolvency carried out by the state in order to support the Euro, and to make it even weaker and more worthless, although Mrs. Merkel speaks of monetary stabilisation, but applies the wrong measures to achieve this at all.
The forecast of what this grand coalition can achieve are costs, for which the citizens will be responsible as the universal paymasters of the State, and otherwise must choose between the dictatorship of the parties or the dictatorship of the Eurocrats. From the conservative parties, we knew that nothing else could happen; we were used to some such things from the socialists, but have to adapt ourselves a little more to understand the new line of the SPD, away from social issues. The SPD is making a great U-turn; it reveals more and will certainly lose more, and not only of its share of the votes in elections by means of further plundering, which will be inflicted on the German people by the Euro zone. The total debt of the German State will rise, as will the indulgence business Euro-Europe. It only remains to be hoped that some sort of miracle will occur to prevent the formation of a government in the way currently intended. Even if it again takes several months until a better solution is found. Any solution is indeed better than that which is currently being forged.