|
The failure of the Black-Yellow government
The Euro was a stillbirth from the very beginning. We have pointed this out in many articles, and also given the
reasons why this is so. As the only means of finding any solution at all of escaping the Euro crisis, the Alliance
for Democracy calls for immediate currency reform, and calls on Chancellor Merkel to finally have the courage to
institute
currency reform.
Since the TV duel on 1st September 2013, we know that Angela Merkel wants to reduce debt, lower taxes and increase
spending.
Sometimes a Federal Chancellor should take a little time to think before she speaks, because some of the statements
made in the course of this duel are contradictory. Wanting to reduce debt, lower taxes and increase spending, and
as Schäuble has already promised, wanting to reduce new borrowing
to zero from 2015,
is impossible in the light of the facts. Nor can this be helped by any guideline competence of which the Chancellor
speaks – this cannot be expected of her.
Continuing to stick to rescue packages and other guarantees, liabilities and loans in return for more loans in
order to extend the life of the national economy can hardly be called a successful policy for overcoming the
crisis. To continue claiming that this is so is merely a deception by a criminal organisation, or to put it
another way: the greatest criminality and its Mafia perpetrators are to be found in the government capitals of
the world. And why Mafia? The Mafia survives from illegal sources of income, such as protection money, which it
collects from both companies and private persons. If these amounts are not paid, the protection is withdrawn,
although this would not be necessary in the first place if there were no such thing as the Mafia.
With the Euro rescue crisis over the introduction of the rescue package liability commitments, the Federal
Government has burdened the citizens with liabilities of unimaginable amounts, which will lead to actual
payments if the party politics which it goes to support continues to fail in all the Euro countries. It has
therefore burdened the citizens with payments which would never come about if the Euro did not exist.
This long-term failure, and the expensive summit meetings, i.e. meetings of government heads guilty of
mismanagement, is the ultimate slap in the face of the interests of the citizens. The Alliance for Democracy
therefore that no
further asylum
should be granted to Chancellor Merkel. Added to this is the fact that there is apparently one advisor to the
Chancellor who sees no further useful life for the Euro. The
“Welt”
reported on 21st April 2013 that the economic advisor to the Federal Government, Kai Konrad, gives the Euro “only a
limited chance of survival in the medium term”. Konrad therefore wants to abolish the debt limits. To an enquiry
from the “Welt”, Konrad replied: “No country can continue incurring debt without end without exposing itself to the
danger that the investors will sooner or later pull the plug. In this respect, it should be in the interests of
every individual to keep their own debts as low as possible. It is however different in individual cases where
the limit lies from which a country can no longer be managed sustainably. This depends amongst other things on
growth dynamics and population development.”
In this respect the wounds of Europe appear to be haemorrhaging again: the disparate country-specific laws and
legalities, which cannot and should not be determined by financial matters alone. Konrad even advises: “Countries
should have the freedom to incur debt as much as they want – subject to the condition that they are also solely
responsible for these debts.”
This however contradicts the previous forced currency union, but Konrad still sees a way: “This works if the bank
sector can be made crisis-proof. Banks should ideally withdraw themselves entirely from state financing. In the
event of insolvency, the creditors of the country in question could then be asked to pay up, without immediately
risking a system crisis.”
So now we no longer need to ask ourselves why the Chancellor, as so often stated, intends to leave office before
the end of the administration: She does not want to be on board the ship when the Euro goes under. But to know this
and then continue to act in this way is an act of cowardice unworthy of a Chancellor!
No Chancellor can instigate such an extensive deception of the people without the assistance of others. These
already include judges, public prosecutors and representatives of the press, who are bound by instructions or
biased, or act under instructions. The result: the Germans are
no longer a sovereign people,
but are on the road to an
undemocratic state.
This is the only thing that the Merkel government can put forward as the result of its work. If the Lady Chancellor
now says that there is nothing that she has left undone, then she is right. But the question remains: What have
Merkel and the government coalition done?
|