ALLIANCE FO§ DEMOCRACY

The rubble women and others

After the Second World War, huge numbers of men were missing, who either failed to find their way home after the war, or who had been severely injured, so that a large part of the reconstruction of Germany was carried out by women, who then went down in history as the “rubble women”. It was they that cleared Germany of rubble and ashes. Unfortunately, there are also women who must be known as “Zertrümmerfrauen” (“destructive women”), and who will also go down in history as such.
One such woman is Chancellor Angela Merkel, also the party chairperson of the CDU.
After she succeeded former chancellors, in particular the former Chancellor Kohl, who was responsible for saddling the FRG with huge debts, and then within the European Monetary Union also became the leader of spurious economic government, it became her responsibility to prop up other indebted countries of this EMU, functioning on the verge of insolvency, with new loans and borrowing, making her a willing accomplice in the practice of delaying insolvency.
This situation cannot be remedied by rescue packages, debt brakes, stability pacts or anything else. The direction of this policy is clear: Citizens have to stand surety for the borrowing policy of the Chancellor and her henchmen in the form of guarantees, liabilities and rescue packages. And this above all because none of the Euro countries are still solvent. Supporting countries support other countries and must themselves be supported by loans.
The German national budget is hopelessly over-indebted. German citizens also stand surety and are liable for insolvent Euro countries such as France, Spain or Italy. Since they have the same effect as loans, these liabilities should appear as cost items in the German national budget, but this is far from the case, because otherwise the Finance Minister could then no longer stick to the self-imposed debt-brake agreements and the other stability agreements made, and the German budget would no longer comply with these legal liabilities, such as the Fiscal Pact. In this way, the German national budget and the budgets of the other Euro countries have been forced into the mould of the Fiscal Pact, or to put it another way: they have been whitewashed and expurgated to comply with the Fiscal Pact. It is almost superfluous to say that this is not conducive to the stability of the currency; it is equally superfluous to claim that this deception can constitute any way out of the crisis. The Alliance for Democracy however says so, because this government unfortunately appears so convinced of it, and the press is loathe to report on it. And so the “Zertrümmerfrauen” in Europe continue their grisly game and are only sometimes elevated from the shadow kingdom. As by Günther Lachmann and Ralph Georg Reuth in the book “The first life of Angela M.” (Verlag Piper), who call Merkel a Communist. At least the authors quoted the English MEP Nigel (Farage), who said that referred to herself in a conversation with him as a Communist.
So we no longer need the statement of a famous business economist, who said “Whoever changes the currency also changes the social system”. And this is exactly the fly in the ointment, because Merkel’s softening towards the Euro is nothing other than this change in the social system, which will result in universal impoverishment. This type of collectivism is surprising, and we suspect that Mrs. Merkel is still quite unaware of it. This constitutes a disturbance of the (political) peace, and what voter would care to know anything about that? Obviously Merkel has nothing to say about that, but instead throws up obfuscations such as: “Trust is good, but control is better” (Stern, No. 22 of 23.5.13, p. 66 ff). This would be the principle according to which she acts. In the inverse sense this means that anyone who is reasonable will act in the same way, so one must control her before being able to trust her, or of someone gives their trust immediately, as is a matter of course between people for the sake of solidarity, this must still be followed by control, and the result of our control has amply demonstrated that trust in her person is totally unjustified.
The Germans have also given expression to this in surveys, but figures such as the national budget are susceptible to “adjustment”, just like the results of surveys. These have been made amenable to the Chancellor and the Fiscal Pact in the same way as the budget, even if only by the adroit omission of facts which would have played an important role in these matters. Who would have rejoiced if they had been asked: “What would you think if the Euro loses purchasing power, which will mean that your pension will be worth hardly anything? Well, poison for the voter, poison for Angela M. – and unfortunately poison for democracy, because anyone who says anything to the contrary will be shadowed and anyone who complains will be told: freedom of discretion of politics, and this does not suffer fools gladly, because in such a ruinous society, anything is possible.