 Recommend this site to a friend |
 deutsch |
Letter to the IMF relation to the
no-value-ECM - 05/12/16
Letter to the CDU Youth Union - 14/11/16
Letter to the IDW regardingthe EFSF’s FinancialStatements – 19/10/16+ Correspondence IDW -> MFD 15/11/16and MFD -> IDW 16/11/16
Letter to the european FinancialSupervision relation to theno-value-ECM - 03/10/16
14th Letter to the Parliament for JudicialReview of the Free-TradeAgreements - 27/05/2016
Application to the ConstitutionalCourt for Judicial Review of theFree-Trade Agreements - 27/05/2016
BILD - Pillory of Shame - 21/12/15
Criminal charge of making a falseallegation against netzpolitik.org - 17/09/2015+ response of Public Prosecutor inBerlin - 20/05/2016
Letter to the Ifo President - 05/11/14
Complaint to the GermanPress Council - 21/11/13
Letter to the IMF - 17/10/13+ Supplementary letter 22/11/13
Letter to the EU Commission - 17/10/13
Letter to the Presidium of the ECB - 17/10/13
Against the dismissal ofFederal President Wulff - 13/06/13+ Response from the HannoverPublic Prosecutor's Office 25/07/13+ Opinion of the Alliance forDemocracy 21/08/13+ Letter to Celle General State Prosecutor’sOffice 10/10/13
Petition for the independence of theJudiciary and State Prosecutor - 06/05/13+ response by the Petitions Committee ofthe German Bundestag - 08/06/16
Petition for the introduction of genuine, directdemocracy - 25/04/13+ reply of the Bundestag - 14/11/16
Petition against corruption - 25/03/2013
Criminal complaint re. Target 2 10/11/2012
1st Constitutional Complaint - against theFederal Government - 21/03/12
2nd Constitutional Complaint - ESM incl.supplement - 12/06/12
3rd Constitutional Complaint - ESM incl.supplement - 18/09/12
4th Constitutional Complaint - FederalGouvernment against the ECB (by CJEU) 27/09/12+ response of FederalConstitutional Court - 06/06/16
Press reports 27/6/12 + 24/10/12
Springer complaint 28/09/11
Delayed insolvency
Petition to the German Parliament 31/05/11
Petition to the European Parliament 21/06/11
1st Letter to Members of Parliament 23/06/11
2nd Letter to Members of Parliament26/09/11
3rd Letter to Members of Parliament 19/05/12
4th Letter to Members of Parliament 23/05/12
5th Letter to Members of Parliament 20/06/12
6th Letter to Members of Parliament 27/06/12
7th Letter to the Parliament 27/9/12
8th Letter to the Parliament 15/10/12 - against Corruption 15/10/12 in addition toPetition 25/03/13
9th Letter to the Parliament 24/10/12
10th Letter to the Parliament 05/12/12
11th Letter to the Parliament - 20/05/13
12th Letter to the Parliament - 16/10/13
13th Letter to the Parliament - 10/12/15
Questions to the Bundestag 27/28/06/12
To the members of the Bundesrat 14/06/12
To the minister of finance 12/06/12
Second Letter to the FinanceMinister - 27/02/15
Objection to Hartz IV - Judicial ReviewComplaint BVerfG
1st Lawsuit against Federal government21/03/11
2nd Lawsuit against Federal government05/10/11
Open letter 16/18/02/11
|
At the end, Mrs. Lagarde?
Ethics charters are the latest hit in business communication, just as annual reports or environmental reports used to be. The fine words are intended to show the customers/suppliers/partners/employees that all is right in this business. The children’s nutritionist HIPP, for example, has such a Charter, as well as the “Verein Deutsche Gesellschaft zum Studium des Schmerzes e. V.” (“German society for the Study of Pain”) or the automotive supplier Faurecia. Following the scandal of the sex-obsessed Dominique Strauss-Kahn, the International Monetary Fund also has such a charter, which was signed by the DSK successor Christine Lagarde. And according to Focus, the IMF went even further and arranged “ethics training” for Mrs. Lagarde, and obliged her “to account annually to all 24 IMF Executive Directors for her” naturally “impeccable conduct”. This all sounds as if we really had corruption-free and totally honest managers. However, aside from the dream, because even the ethics charter cannot offer protection from unimpeachable conduct of earlier years. The Paris Prosecutor’s Office is therefore investigating whether Mrs. Lagarde “embezzled funds” during her time as French Finance Minister, “committed “abuse of office” and/or even “aiding and abetting fraud”. The actual case itself is of no interest: what is interesting is that Focus claims that Lagarde was considered as the most promising candidate for the upcoming presidential election in the year 2016. If “La Grande Nation” were to go to the polls this year, then the 62-year old Lagarde would hardly be any hope for the French, because as Chairwoman of the IMF she has contributed significantly to the deterioration of the value of the Euro, and has hardly supported the French economy. In this respect the context seen by Focus is a nice thought that hopes to recognise a legitimacy that might be common amongst popes, but certainly not amongst politicians. |