 Recommend this site to a friend |
 deutsch |
Letter to the IMF relation to the
no-value-ECM - 05/12/16
Letter to the CDU Youth Union - 14/11/16
Letter to the IDW regardingthe EFSF’s FinancialStatements – 19/10/16+ Correspondence IDW -> MFD 15/11/16and MFD -> IDW 16/11/16
Letter to the european FinancialSupervision relation to theno-value-ECM - 03/10/16
14th Letter to the Parliament for JudicialReview of the Free-TradeAgreements - 27/05/2016
Application to the ConstitutionalCourt for Judicial Review of theFree-Trade Agreements - 27/05/2016
BILD - Pillory of Shame - 21/12/15
Criminal charge of making a falseallegation against netzpolitik.org - 17/09/2015+ response of Public Prosecutor inBerlin - 20/05/2016
Letter to the Ifo President - 05/11/14
Complaint to the GermanPress Council - 21/11/13
Letter to the IMF - 17/10/13+ Supplementary letter 22/11/13
Letter to the EU Commission - 17/10/13
Letter to the Presidium of the ECB - 17/10/13
Against the dismissal ofFederal President Wulff - 13/06/13+ Response from the HannoverPublic Prosecutor's Office 25/07/13+ Opinion of the Alliance forDemocracy 21/08/13+ Letter to Celle General State Prosecutor’sOffice 10/10/13
Petition for the independence of theJudiciary and State Prosecutor - 06/05/13+ response by the Petitions Committee ofthe German Bundestag - 08/06/16
Petition for the introduction of genuine, directdemocracy - 25/04/13+ reply of the Bundestag - 14/11/16
Petition against corruption - 25/03/2013
Criminal complaint re. Target 2 10/11/2012
1st Constitutional Complaint - against theFederal Government - 21/03/12
2nd Constitutional Complaint - ESM incl.supplement - 12/06/12
3rd Constitutional Complaint - ESM incl.supplement - 18/09/12
4th Constitutional Complaint - FederalGouvernment against the ECB (by CJEU) 27/09/12+ response of FederalConstitutional Court - 06/06/16
Press reports 27/6/12 + 24/10/12
Springer complaint 28/09/11
Delayed insolvency
Petition to the German Parliament 31/05/11
Petition to the European Parliament 21/06/11
1st Letter to Members of Parliament 23/06/11
2nd Letter to Members of Parliament26/09/11
3rd Letter to Members of Parliament 19/05/12
4th Letter to Members of Parliament 23/05/12
5th Letter to Members of Parliament 20/06/12
6th Letter to Members of Parliament 27/06/12
7th Letter to the Parliament 27/9/12
8th Letter to the Parliament 15/10/12 - against Corruption 15/10/12 in addition toPetition 25/03/13
9th Letter to the Parliament 24/10/12
10th Letter to the Parliament 05/12/12
11th Letter to the Parliament - 20/05/13
12th Letter to the Parliament - 16/10/13
13th Letter to the Parliament - 10/12/15
Questions to the Bundestag 27/28/06/12
To the members of the Bundesrat 14/06/12
To the minister of finance 12/06/12
Second Letter to the FinanceMinister - 27/02/15
Objection to Hartz IV - Judicial ReviewComplaint BVerfG
1st Lawsuit against Federal government21/03/11
2nd Lawsuit against Federal government05/10/11
Open letter 16/18/02/11
|
Political control
The head of the so-called research network “VroniPlag”, Martin Heidingsfelder, now intends to scour the doctorate thesis of mathematician Johanna Wanka (61) for possible citation errors. According to the German press agency (dpa), Heidingsfelder intends to review the thesis, written at the Technical University of Leuna-Merseburg at the height of the GDR era (1980), entitled “Resolution of contact and control problems by potential theoretical means” before the appointment of the future Minister on 14th February 2013. It remains to be seen whether Heidingsfelder’s search will be successful; and also how the results of this search will be evaluated. And then the question will arise of whether the discussion over such “mistakes” will lead to any conclusion. Previously the following has applied: Errors in degree theses have a limitation period of five years; Errors in doctorate theses and higher qualifications are not subject to any limitation period – a doctor or professor title can therefore be withdrawn even a hundred years later. Currently such a title may only be withdrawn if the offence of deliberate deception can be proven. Legal action comes under the Administrative Procedure Act (in conjunction with the applicable regulations of the respective universities, which may differ from state to state), which is to be applied in the event of suspected deceit or deliberate deceit. In the case of Annette Schavan and other politicians, the withdrawal of the title also resulted in the loss of political tasks. Irrespective of the compensation such as transitional allowance, pensions, care payments, it therefore remains to be considered whether the suspicion is so increased that the title must be withdrawn. In the Schavan affair this was obviously the case. And then rogues and dreamers, and even political opponents, who might offer the shirt off their back to the plagiarism-hunter Heidingsfelder, may hope with all their heart to bring about the downfall of the Chancellor, because there would be no easier way to remove her from the highest office in Germany, and so we learn: This is also how politics works! |