share Recommend this site to a friend
deutsch deutsch
bombLetter to the IMF relation to the
Headbombno-value-ECM - 05/12/16
bombLetter to the CDU Youth Union - 14/11/16 bombLetter to the IDW regarding
Headbombthe EFSF’s Financial
HeadbombStatements – 19/10/16
Headbomb+ Correspondence IDW -> MFD 15/11/16
Headbomband MFD -> IDW 16/11/16
bombLetter to the european Financial
HeadbombSupervision relation to the
Headbombno-value-ECM - 03/10/16
bomb14th Letter to the Parliament for Judicial
HeadbombReview of the Free-Trade
HeadbombAgreements - 27/05/2016
bombApplication to the Constitutional
HeadbombCourt for Judicial Review of the
HeadbombFree-Trade Agreements - 27/05/2016
bombBILD - Pillory of Shame - 21/12/15 bombCriminal charge of making a false
Headbomballegation against - 17/09/2015
Headbomb+ response of Public Prosecutor in
HeadbombBerlin - 20/05/2016
bombLetter to the Ifo President - 05/11/14 bombComplaint to the German
HeadbombPress Council - 21/11/13
bombLetter to the IMF - 17/10/13
Headbomb+ Supplementary letter 22/11/13
bombLetter to the EU Commission - 17/10/13 bombLetter to the Presidium of the ECB - 17/10/13 bombAgainst the dismissal of
HeadbombFederal President Wulff - 13/06/13
Headbomb+ Response from the Hannover
HeadbombPublic Prosecutor's Office 25/07/13
Headbomb+ Opinion of the Alliance for
HeadbombDemocracy 21/08/13
Headbomb+ Letter to Celle General State Prosecutor’s
HeadbombOffice 10/10/13
bombPetition for the independence of the
HeadbombJudiciary and State Prosecutor - 06/05/13
Headbomb+ response by the Petitions Committee of
Headbombthe German Bundestag - 08/06/16
bombPetition for the introduction of genuine, direct
Headbombdemocracy - 25/04/13
Headbomb+ reply of the Bundestag - 14/11/16
bombPetition against corruption - 25/03/2013 bombCriminal complaint re. Target 2 10/11/2012 bomb1st Constitutional Complaint - against the
HeadbombFederal Government - 21/03/12
bomb2nd Constitutional Complaint - ESM incl.
Headbombsupplement - 12/06/12
bomb3rd Constitutional Complaint - ESM incl.
Headbombsupplement - 18/09/12
bomb4th Constitutional Complaint - Federal
HeadbombGouvernment against the ECB (by CJEU)
Headbomb+ response of Federal
HeadbombConstitutional Court - 06/06/16
bombPress reports 27/6/12 + 24/10/12 bombSpringer complaint 28/09/11 bombDelayed insolvency bombPetition to the German Parliament 31/05/11 bombPetition to the European Parliament 21/06/11 bomb1st Letter to Members of Parliament 23/06/11 bomb2nd Letter to Members of Parliament
bomb3rd Letter to Members of Parliament 19/05/12 bomb4th Letter to Members of Parliament 23/05/12 bomb5th Letter to Members of Parliament 20/06/12 bomb6th Letter to Members of Parliament 27/06/12 bomb7th Letter to the Parliament 27/9/12 bomb8th Letter to the Parliament 15/10/12 -
Headbombagainst Corruption 15/10/12 in addition to
HeadbombPetition 25/03/13
bomb9th Letter to the Parliament 24/10/12 bomb10th Letter to the Parliament 05/12/12 bomb11th Letter to the Parliament - 20/05/13 bomb12th Letter to the Parliament - 16/10/13 bomb13th Letter to the Parliament - 10/12/15 bombQuestions to the Bundestag 27/28/06/12 bombTo the members of the Bundesrat 14/06/12 bombTo the minister of finance 12/06/12 bombSecond Letter to the Finance
HeadbombMinister - 27/02/15
bombObjection to Hartz IV - Judicial Review
HeadbombComplaint BVerfG
bomb1st Lawsuit against Federal government
bomb2nd Lawsuit against Federal government
bombOpen letter 16/18/02/11

The Sinn Problem - 5 Theories, 5 Errors?

In an article appearing in its edition of 16 January, the business daily Handelsblatt dedicates several pages to the distinguished German economist Hans-Werner Sinn. The article is titled “The Sinn Question – Five Theories, Five Errors.” The only question is, who is in error? Hans-Werner Sinn, or Handelsblatt ?
The first theory is of special interest to the Alliance for Democracy. It concerns the so-called Target 2 claims.
Here is an example: Stavros, a Greek citizen, wants to buy a new Mercedes from Franz of Germany. Stavros has no money. So, he seeks a loan from his local bank in Greece. The bank is instructed to send the money to Franz in Germany. The money has to make various intermediate stops along the way. It goes from Stavros’ bank to the Greek central bank, from there to the German Bundesbank, and finally to Franz’s local German bank. In the process, Stavros’ local bank has to provide collateral (e.g. Greek government bonds). The German central bank then pays the money to Franz’s local bank and Franz can then withdraw the money. This means: effectively it is the German central bank who pays. In return, it receives collateral. In addition, it has a claim against the Greek central bank. However, for simplification purposes, the European Monetary System stipulates that transactions within the Eurozone be settled at the end of the day. Therefore, instead of a claim against the foreign central bank there is a claim against the ECB corresponding to the total balance. These are the Target 2 claims of the German central bank against the ECB. The ECB acquires a corresponding total claim against central banks that have a negative balance.
According to Handelsblatt , this is the way German claims against Greek debtors are secured. Without the Target 2 cash injections from the ECB, the Greek banking system would be ineffective. Franz, from our example above, would therefore receive nothing. There is a bit of truth in the Handelsblatt opinion, but it is less than half the truth and therefore erroneous.
Firstly: If Target 2 did not exist, Franz would not take the risk of selling his car to Stavros. He would sell it to someone else who is financially solvent. This means: Target 2 results in more and more sales to insolvent parties. In criminal law that is called fraud and/or the failure to file for insolvency in due time.

Secondly: Franz does receive his money. Therefore, for Franz the sale to Stavros was successful. But does the German central bank receive its money from the ECB? And the ECB its money from Greece? Not likely. Significant risks are incurred by the German Bundesbank and the ECB. The central banks have to seek compensation for this default from the state, i.e. the taxpayers, through (still) higher taxes (or still more debt).

The accumulation of significant risks by the central banks is therefore no security. It is rather a deferral of the risks, which will most likely become a reality with disastrous consequences.
The economic advice of Hans-Werner Sinn is as simple as it is accurate: Such risks should not be accumulated but eliminated to avoid the big bang! The answer to the Sinn question is therefore clear: It is Handelsblatt that is in error.