share Recommend this site to a friend
deutsch deutsch
bombLetter to the IMF relation to the
Headbombno-value-ECM - 05/12/16
bombLetter to the CDU Youth Union - 14/11/16 bombLetter to the IDW regarding
Headbombthe EFSF’s Financial
HeadbombStatements – 19/10/16
Headbomb+ Correspondence IDW -> MFD 15/11/16
Headbomband MFD -> IDW 16/11/16
bombLetter to the european Financial
HeadbombSupervision relation to the
Headbombno-value-ECM - 03/10/16
bomb14th Letter to the Parliament for Judicial
HeadbombReview of the Free-Trade
HeadbombAgreements - 27/05/2016
bombApplication to the Constitutional
HeadbombCourt for Judicial Review of the
HeadbombFree-Trade Agreements - 27/05/2016
bombBILD - Pillory of Shame - 21/12/15 bombCriminal charge of making a false
Headbomballegation against - 17/09/2015
Headbomb+ response of Public Prosecutor in
HeadbombBerlin - 20/05/2016
bombLetter to the Ifo President - 05/11/14 bombComplaint to the German
HeadbombPress Council - 21/11/13
bombLetter to the IMF - 17/10/13
Headbomb+ Supplementary letter 22/11/13
bombLetter to the EU Commission - 17/10/13 bombLetter to the Presidium of the ECB - 17/10/13 bombAgainst the dismissal of
HeadbombFederal President Wulff - 13/06/13
Headbomb+ Response from the Hannover
HeadbombPublic Prosecutor's Office 25/07/13
Headbomb+ Opinion of the Alliance for
HeadbombDemocracy 21/08/13
Headbomb+ Letter to Celle General State Prosecutor’s
HeadbombOffice 10/10/13
bombPetition for the independence of the
HeadbombJudiciary and State Prosecutor - 06/05/13
Headbomb+ response by the Petitions Committee of
Headbombthe German Bundestag - 08/06/16
bombPetition for the introduction of genuine, direct
Headbombdemocracy - 25/04/13
Headbomb+ reply of the Bundestag - 14/11/16
bombPetition against corruption - 25/03/2013 bombCriminal complaint re. Target 2 10/11/2012 bomb1st Constitutional Complaint - against the
HeadbombFederal Government - 21/03/12
bomb2nd Constitutional Complaint - ESM incl.
Headbombsupplement - 12/06/12
bomb3rd Constitutional Complaint - ESM incl.
Headbombsupplement - 18/09/12
bomb4th Constitutional Complaint - Federal
HeadbombGouvernment against the ECB (by CJEU)
Headbomb+ response of Federal
HeadbombConstitutional Court - 06/06/16
bombPress reports 27/6/12 + 24/10/12 bombSpringer complaint 28/09/11 bombDelayed insolvency bombPetition to the German Parliament 31/05/11 bombPetition to the European Parliament 21/06/11 bomb1st Letter to Members of Parliament 23/06/11 bomb2nd Letter to Members of Parliament
bomb3rd Letter to Members of Parliament 19/05/12 bomb4th Letter to Members of Parliament 23/05/12 bomb5th Letter to Members of Parliament 20/06/12 bomb6th Letter to Members of Parliament 27/06/12 bomb7th Letter to the Parliament 27/9/12 bomb8th Letter to the Parliament 15/10/12 -
Headbombagainst Corruption 15/10/12 in addition to
HeadbombPetition 25/03/13
bomb9th Letter to the Parliament 24/10/12 bomb10th Letter to the Parliament 05/12/12 bomb11th Letter to the Parliament - 20/05/13 bomb12th Letter to the Parliament - 16/10/13 bomb13th Letter to the Parliament - 10/12/15 bombQuestions to the Bundestag 27/28/06/12 bombTo the members of the Bundesrat 14/06/12 bombTo the minister of finance 12/06/12 bombSecond Letter to the Finance
HeadbombMinister - 27/02/15
bombObjection to Hartz IV - Judicial Review
HeadbombComplaint BVerfG
bomb1st Lawsuit against Federal government
bomb2nd Lawsuit against Federal government
bombOpen letter 16/18/02/11

HeadbombCriminal charge of making
Headbomba false allegation against is an online platform which publishes documents, including internal government documents, for the purposes of journalistic and political transparency. And this therefore included the plans of the German intelligence services to expand their surveillance of online communications (see pp. 108 – 116).
Instead of facing public debate and responding to such questions as “How much surveillance do we need? How much surveillance do we want?”, the intelligence service responded with authoritarian force and brought a criminal charge of treason against As a result of the charge, the Federal Public Prosecutor General, Harald Range, instituted criminal investigations which ultimately he had to suspend on the instructions of the Minister for Justice. The criticism coming from the public had become all too audible. The Federal Public Prosecutor General resigned while the head of the intelligence services, Hans-Georg Maaßen, who was responsible for filing the criminal charge (i.e. the actual culprit), remains in office.
The criminal charge of treason is an over-reaction on the part of those responsible. Treason means deliberately harming the state by betraying its secrets. When someone lumps journalism and treason together under the same heading, it proves that the intelligence service is concerned with (covertly) exercising its power outside democratic control; criticism is being suppressed to this end.
Alliance fo§ Democracy filed a criminal charge of making a false allegation with the Public Prosecutor’s Office in Berlin against Hans-Georg Maaßen as the individual responsible.
Some time elapsed without a response, and so Alliance fo§ Democracy followed it up with a letter, to which an answer was received.
The relevant Public Prosecutor was unable to identify any indication of a criminal act having been committed. Hence, the false allegation (in accordance with Section 164 of the German Criminal Code) could not be considered. The Public Prosecutor’s clarification stated that the authorities involved were in the right in investigating and that “no criminal conduct by the reported individual was identifiable in any other legal respects”; the case was therefore terminated in accordance with section 170 (2) of the German Code of Criminal Procedure.
Alliance fo§ Democracy wonders how it is possible for a government authority to take so long to ascertain in a matter that is subject to public debate that there is nothing to ascertain. Hans-Georg Maaßen is allowed (protected by politics) to pursue his undemocratic agenda. Providing too much information to parliament and the people harms the party-political calculus and interferes with the intelligence service peddling their wares. The attempt by a people’s organisation to obtain legal clarification by means of a criminal charge was rejected by the Public Prosecutor’s Office in Berlin - without any investigation and giving a purely formal reason - and is a total failure of justice. The judiciary is therefore no longer a third estate or a corrective; as has been shown in many other cases, the judiciary is in thrall to politics.

Alliance fo§ Democracy remains on the case and will be reporting.