share Recommend this site to a friend
deutsch deutsch
ALLIANCE FO§ DEMOCRACY
bombLetter to the IMF relation to the
Headbombno-value-ECM - 05/12/16
bombLetter to the CDU Youth Union - 14/11/16 bombLetter to the IDW regarding
Headbombthe EFSF’s Financial
HeadbombStatements – 19/10/16
Headbomb+ Correspondence IDW -> MFD 15/11/16
Headbomband MFD -> IDW 16/11/16
bombLetter to the european Financial
HeadbombSupervision relation to the
Headbombno-value-ECM - 03/10/16
bomb14th Letter to the Parliament for Judicial
HeadbombReview of the Free-Trade
HeadbombAgreements - 27/05/2016
bombApplication to the Constitutional
HeadbombCourt for Judicial Review of the
HeadbombFree-Trade Agreements - 27/05/2016
bombBILD - Pillory of Shame - 21/12/15 bombCriminal charge of making a false
Headbomballegation against netzpolitik.org - 17/09/2015
Headbomb+ response of Public Prosecutor in
HeadbombBerlin - 20/05/2016
bombLetter to the Ifo President - 05/11/14 bombComplaint to the German
HeadbombPress Council - 21/11/13
bombLetter to the IMF - 17/10/13
Headbomb+ Supplementary letter 22/11/13
bombLetter to the EU Commission - 17/10/13 bombLetter to the Presidium of the ECB - 17/10/13 bombAgainst the dismissal of
HeadbombFederal President Wulff - 13/06/13
Headbomb+ Response from the Hannover
HeadbombPublic Prosecutor's Office 25/07/13
Headbomb+ Opinion of the Alliance for
HeadbombDemocracy 21/08/13
Headbomb+ Letter to Celle General State Prosecutor’s
HeadbombOffice 10/10/13
bombPetition for the independence of the
HeadbombJudiciary and State Prosecutor - 06/05/13
Headbomb+ response by the Petitions Committee of
Headbombthe German Bundestag - 08/06/16
bombPetition for the introduction of genuine, direct
Headbombdemocracy - 25/04/13
Headbomb+ reply of the Bundestag - 14/11/16
bombPetition against corruption - 25/03/2013 bombCriminal complaint re. Target 2 10/11/2012 bomb1st Constitutional Complaint - against the
HeadbombFederal Government - 21/03/12
bomb2nd Constitutional Complaint - ESM incl.
Headbombsupplement - 12/06/12
bomb3rd Constitutional Complaint - ESM incl.
Headbombsupplement - 18/09/12
bomb4th Constitutional Complaint - Federal
HeadbombGouvernment against the ECB (by CJEU)
Headbomb27/09/12
Headbomb+ response of Federal
HeadbombConstitutional Court - 06/06/16
bombPress reports 27/6/12 + 24/10/12 bombSpringer complaint 28/09/11 bombDelayed insolvency bombPetition to the German Parliament 31/05/11 bombPetition to the European Parliament 21/06/11 bomb1st Letter to Members of Parliament 23/06/11 bomb2nd Letter to Members of Parliament
Headbomb26/09/11
bomb3rd Letter to Members of Parliament 19/05/12 bomb4th Letter to Members of Parliament 23/05/12 bomb5th Letter to Members of Parliament 20/06/12 bomb6th Letter to Members of Parliament 27/06/12 bomb7th Letter to the Parliament 27/9/12 bomb8th Letter to the Parliament 15/10/12 -
Headbombagainst Corruption 15/10/12 in addition to
HeadbombPetition 25/03/13
bomb9th Letter to the Parliament 24/10/12 bomb10th Letter to the Parliament 05/12/12 bomb11th Letter to the Parliament - 20/05/13 bomb12th Letter to the Parliament - 16/10/13 bomb13th Letter to the Parliament - 10/12/15 bombQuestions to the Bundestag 27/28/06/12 bombTo the members of the Bundesrat 14/06/12 bombTo the minister of finance 12/06/12 bombSecond Letter to the Finance
HeadbombMinister - 27/02/15
bombObjection to Hartz IV - Judicial Review
HeadbombComplaint BVerfG
bomb1st Lawsuit against Federal government
bomb21/03/11
bomb2nd Lawsuit against Federal government
bomb05/10/11
bombOpen letter 16/18/02/11





HeadbombSpringer complaint

In order to draw the attention of more readers to our website, we made announcements in numerous German daily newspapers, weekly newspapers and magazines, also in Austria, and also in Switzerland.

In Germany the BILD and the Rhein-Neckar-Zeitung and Die Welt refused to print our wake-up call. Since on the basis of the correspondence between the Alliance for Democracy and the two last mentioned newspapers we doubt very much to what extent freedom of expression still really applies in Germany, Die Welt at least confirmed what we already suspected: The announcement was “not printed because of its political content”. Nor could it be established to what extent the political content of our announcement weighed in the balance, since Die Welt declined to state its position on this matter.

The entire process is unthinkable in a democracy, and also an untenable condition and a severe violation of the fundamental legal right of freedom of expression. When journalists make policy, and how deeply they are involved can be seen from their reports about the Euro crisis, which disguise, cover up and conceal the situation, then the press has long since departed from its true tasks of reporting and explaining political matters; involvement in political affairs, and making themselves jointly responsible for political mistakes, is not the task of the press.

Although it must be embarrassing enough for the above papers to be cited here in this context, we are first bringing an action against the BILD, since one department had declared itself ready to print our announcement, and we had already paid the quoted fee. Then the paper made a retraction, so that we found ourselves compelled to demand performance of the contract.

In the course of the ongoing legal proceedings, the Axel Springer AG has now retracted its retraction, and agreed to publish the advertisements of the Alliance for Democracy. The current proceedings were thus concluded with a settlement, by which the Axel Springer AG under Item 1 explicitly undertook to publish the previously rejected advertisement in the BILD, Die Welt and the Welt am Sonntag – promptly of course.

Part of the settlement was a concession by the Alliance for Democracy as regards the out-of-court legal fees incurred and the agreement that the Court should decide on the costs according to the status of the dispute so far. The Court however, contrary to the actual agreement, assumed that a case exists in which no agreement was made concerning the costs incurred, and decided not to decide on the costs according to the status of the dispute, but in accordance with § 98 ZPO, and that the costs should be borne jointly.

Despite the unfortunate costs decision, the Alliance for Democracy considers this as a victory in the case and therefore also a victory of democracy, especially the constitutional right to freedom of expression in a media environment which unfortunately all too often pursues only its own interests.
spot
spot
spot